75

Many people are now talking about the "death of the ad-supported internet model," and I can only say that it can't come quickly enough.

The main reason why it all switched to ad-supported is the massive costs of storing and streaming all that high-definition video. And for what? So I can see every pore on Joe Rogan's face while he sits in front of the mic and talks for 3 hours?

Or so that some video game dweeb can read his essay about why an obscure JRPG is the height of postmodern art over 30 minutes of game footage. Or all the channels trying to imitate Kurzgesagt with shitty animation and information they gathered from browsing Wikipedia.

Face it. Most of this video is unnecessary. 99.9% of all possible information can be relayed through text, pictures, and the occasional sound file.

Furthermore, most video content creators are unnecessary too. I can just read about a laptop's specs and the reviewer's experience with it. I don't need LinusTechTips to stare at me with his reptilian eyes while he destroys the inferior product with an oversized novelty mallet.

Most of what's on YouTube and other video-heavy social sites is not insightful, not creative, not informative, not fun, not sexy, and honestly shouldn't exist at all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] arf_arf@reddthat.com -4 points 1 year ago

Most books are probably crap (Sturgeon’s law) but most of what is in books can’t be relayed in another way.

Books (or online text) allow for thoughts or information to be collected in a way that is informationally dense yet compact while also serving as a (virtually) permanent physical record.

That’s the advantage that books have over relating information orally.

In contrast to books or text, videos are informationally sparse yet very large.

But maybe I missed something, please feel free to elaborate on your point.

[-] BleatingZombie@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago

So you're argument boils down to "the presence of bad apple means we should toss the whole bunch"

Must be a police library...

[-] RunningWolfie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is an awful take, books can be relayed as audio, ever hear of audiobooks? I guess fuck blind people right?

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Books (or online text) allow for thoughts or information to be collected in a way that is informationally dense yet compact while also serving as a (virtually) permanent physical record.

What is the difference between a text file and a video file in the digital space? You're argument seems invalid at it's core.

[-] arf_arf@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

The difference is a 1000 word article requires maybe 500kbs to be stored and the size of a video of someone reading that article in glorious 4k60fps even with the best compression algorithms in the world would be still be several orders of magnitude larger.

That data has to be stored somewhere. Those datacenters require energy and maintenance which is neither cheap nor very good for the climate.

But there’s two points I’m trying to make and I may have conflated then somewhat.

  1. Text is the superior mode of knowledge transfer. It’s easily searchable (more so in digital form but even print allows for tables or content and indexes), can be re-read or scanned through easier than scrubbing through a video file.
  2. The vast majority of video content online is vapid and doesn’t need to exist either at all or just in video form. Short clips of concerts on Instagram, video reviews of things that don’t require visual demonstrations, essays read over what is essentially archival footage, video podcasts that are two hours of a group of guys sitting around a table…
[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

If I was curating videos 99% of TikTok and Twitch streams wouldn't make the cut because they seem utterly pointless to me. But they are both massively popular so I think it's better to just let people produce content and what's popular will sort itself out. It's good to have choices.

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
75 points (79.5% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6186 readers
55 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS