357
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Sen. Mitch McConnell warned that Donald Trump’s presidency places Americans in a “very, very dangerous world,” likening Trump’s isolationist policies to pre-World War II “America First” rhetoric.

McConnell, a staunch interventionist, criticized the GOP’s growing resistance to U.S. global engagement, particularly Trump’s stance on reducing aid to Ukraine.

While he voted for Trump in November, McConnell expressed concerns over Trump’s influence and the party’s direction.

Recently stepping down as Senate GOP leader, McConnell plans to focus his final term on countering isolationism within his party.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

I think Biden was too moderate on justice, but I'd be hard pressed to think of a more progressive president than him in my lifetime. Since you said you were only happy voting for Obama in 2008, I assume you are similarly disappointed in his performance compared to his campaign, and I can't think of anyone else even in the running. So I don't judge his moderation harshly. A more progressive candidate probably can't win the swing states, and I think Kamala demonstrated that (though racism and misogyny and such also played a role, I'm sure).

As for third party, I did that for years. I think up to 2000, I always voted third party. Obviously did no good, but it was never because I wanted the candidate to win, but as a protest vote against both parties. I always imagined if they wanted my vote, they would have to adopt a platform closer to my personal way of thinking. Instead, Republicans sprinted hard right away from me, so now I've got no one to vote for but Dems.

I have no party loyalty at all (don't even see myself as a Democrat), but I thought Obama was a good leader even if he wasn't everything I wanted. Same with Biden. He doesn't get nearly enough credit for the "soft landing" and one of the lowest inflation rates anywhere and his dedication to student loan relief. But what I really loved about him was he wasn't Trump, and I admired Kamala for the way she also wasn't Trump.

Even if I were still a conservative, I would still vote for a moderate Democrat on that basis. I don't understand why McConnell didn't.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

but I’d be hard pressed to think of a more progressive president than him in my lifetime

Huh?

I think you're confusing an 81 year old who finally stopped fighting against social change and someone fighting for social change...

And Obama was far from perfect, but waaaaaay more progressive than Joe. Joe was literally bundled with Obama so old white people wouldn't be scared of the young smooth talking Black guy with a progressive campaign.

What logic makes Biden the most progressive president of your life time?

And that's an opinion, if you believe it to be true. I struggle to understand why that means it's enough when it clearly wasn't or trump wouldn't be going back to the White House....

Quick edit:

dedication to student loans

Lol

What about his dedication to abortion too? Or anything else he promised, barely tried to do, then immediately called voters ignorant for thinking a Dem president with a Dem House and Dem Senate could accomplish anything.

After running a primary campaign focused solely on how only he could get Senate Republicans to vote for the Dem party platform.

Stop giving credit for what they say they want to do, give credit after they do something

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

What progressive policies did Obama enact besides the completely watered down ACA—that was a Republican plan? He could've pushed for single-payer when the Dems had full control and didn't.

What else did he do? Because I remember him being largely a milquetoast pro-corporate Dem who was about as progressive as Bill Clinton.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 6 days ago

He DID push for single payer. It was Joe Lieberman who fucked us over with that, not Obama. As you know, presidents aren't kings and the policies they want to enact must go through Congress.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Oh...

Only accomplishments count now?

Man. Good thing you can only defend Biden or attack everyone else, if you could do both at the same time you might actually have a point

Because Biden's list of accomplishments is pretty much "didn't die in office".

Everything else is shit he "tried" to accomplish

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

A more progressive candidate probably can’t win the swing states, and I think Kamala demonstrated that

In what world did Kamala not run as a conservative democrat? She talked about her glock more than climate change, sucked up to every Republican willing to be decent for once, and took the stage how many times with Liz Cheney while not allowing even 60 seconds of speech from a pro-Palestine lawmaker or advocate at the DNC, and went hard right on the border. And shit at this point I've probably brain dumped other events that had my jaw on the floor. She spent most of the last month holding hands with as many Republicans as she could, trying to get as many R votes as she could (spoiler alert - it was precious few).

And I'm not even super far left compared to a lot of potential D voters. I voted for her anyhow, but angrily by that point. She killed the motivation of many likely D voters all to rub noses with republicans and conservatives in the most crucial weeks of the campaign. To suck up to the very people who got us to this point in the first place and pretend every last fucking one of them wasn't complicit.

All I can remember now from her campaign:

  • I'm not Trump
  • I'm not Biden, but don't expect much to change
  • Look how much these three Republicans like me
  • Fuck Gaza
  • Fuck a sustainable and humane border policy
  • I own a glock
  • Vote for me and we can pretend it's 2016 again, because those are the policy positions I will bring.

Edited to add - and that's the last time I cast an angry vote for D. I've done it enough times. They need to get their shit together, or stop pretending they are anything other than corporate owned slightly less evil conservatives compared to R. If I can't feel good about pulling the lever for D next time, I'll pull it for someone else.

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
357 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2939 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS