608
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Atlusb@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

Yes, but only because of the gorilla. No other significant difference in policy.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Which policy though?

He did support invading Iraq, he certainly would have invaded Afghanistan. He would have been coup'd by his own party if he actually threatened the fossil fuel industry.

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

Gorilla policy

[-] Nanook@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

“no other significant policy” ≈ would do all the same things, except Gorilla.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

shhh, be quieter when you talk to the gorilla. they're sensitive creatures

[-] criitz@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago
[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

Gore supported the first war in Iraq, and bombing Yugoslavia. Why do you think he would have been any different RE gorillas or imperialism?

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
608 points (99.2% liked)

196

16707 readers
2175 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS