29

I have an economics teacher that made this claim in class yesterday. I wanted to know other people’s thoughts about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rational_lib@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

If the law said my car is no longer my property, then driving away with it would cease to be stealing, correct. What is property without legal, government-backed title? There's no way to formulate a definition, because without government and laws property has no meaning.

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Property has existed before laws existed to enforce it. It was enforced with violence. Stealing is still stealing even if there's no law against it.

[-] rational_lib@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And if there was a disagreement about whose property was who's? With no laws to settle it, it would just be determined by who grabs said property and runs off with it first. That's indistinguishable from a free-for-all.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
29 points (75.4% liked)

Asklemmy

44122 readers
427 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS