222
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Biden allowed the prosecution of Hunter to avoid the appearance of not being neutral.

Now that Trump has won and a) is openly talking about pardoning anyone and everyone and b) wanting to prosecute his enemies list, it 100% makes sense to beat him to the punch and pardon Hunter.

If Kamala had won, he would have let it all stand.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago

Biden allowed the prosecution of Hunter to avoid the appearance of not being neutral

But the reality is he wasnt neutral...

So, when you portray a situation falsely because you know the blowback would hurt your chances in an upcoming election (Biden was the candidate then)

That is commonly referred to:

Being a fucking liar

And when you do that for something everyone knows you're lying about, that's going to hurt turnout for the entire party, even if you do eventually shuffle off the stage before the election.

You may be 100% of with the only two parties only running liars

But if you want a way to make Dems able to win again, fight for honest authentic candidates who will help Americans.

You'll never find a neoliberal as good as lying as a Republican. So why play that game.

If Kamala had won, he would have let it all stand.

My opinion is obviously he wouldn't have. I'm not sure why your preventing your opinion as a fact, or even why you still think the next president somehow controls sentencing...

Like, you get that right?

That the entire premise for your argument about why this is ok has no factual basis?

If you think I'm wrong, by all means explain how the incoming president co trolls that, and how Biden wasn't able to control it now for a fair result and not an all or nothing like you're presenting

[-] Snowflake@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

So, when you portray a situation falsely because you know the blowback would hurt your chances in an upcoming election (Biden was the candidate then)

Are you seriously upset that Biden pardoned his son's charges of checking the no box to the do you use drugs question on his firearm application. And paying his taxes late?

That's gotta be every single weed smoker in a recreational state.

And when you do that for something everyone knows you're lying about, that's going to hurt turnout for the entire party, even if you do eventually shuffle off the stage before the election.

Oh he shuffled off stage all right. Right before the democratic wolve party beat him with a broomstick and replaced him with a pinata.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

That poster basically lambasts Biden all the time. It's their whole schtick

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, he definitely wasn't neutral, no father could be, that's why I say he was trying to avoid the APPEARANCE of not being neutral. ;)

Now that Trump has won and is talking crazy shit, there's no need to maintain appearances.

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
222 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19244 readers
1968 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS