this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
683 points (98.3% liked)

Political Memes

5491 readers
1898 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They barely teach about it as it is. My daughter's social studies textbook had page after page about Marbury v. Madison and two paragraphs about Harriet Tumbman.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Harriet Tubman was a great hero, but she did not shape society. Marbury v. Madison established judicial review, which allows the SC to strike down laws as unconstitutional. That's massive. Brown v. Board of Education or Roe v. Wade rely on that.

Judicial review has been adopted by republics around the world (though not all). Writing as a European, I believe it's a greatly underappreciated US contribution to global culture and the cause of democracy and human rights.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Marbury v. Madison established judicial review, which allows the SC to strike down laws as unconstitutional.

That is literally all a 14-year-old needs to know about it.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

What are they actually taught about MvM?

I'm not sure what kids should be taught about Tubman. Generally, I don't think hero stories have much to say on society or history. Tubman makes for a good exception, as her story teaches the lesson that African-Americans and women were not merely passive objects of history but people who made their own decisions. It also teaches us that there are things that even the supposedly powerless can do. Even so, how much of her actual biography belongs in a social studies text?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

At 14 a "normal" kid is in 9th grade, correct? As in they didn't start early, skip a grade, start behind, or get held back. At 9th grade, we should be preparing our kids for higher education. They need at least a paragraph so that the more curious kids take a further look into things.

I agree that Harriet Tubman and the UR deserve more attention than Indiana history books teach, I went to HS at MCHS in Madison, IN. And, boy howdy did they whitewash history back in the '90s.

At least we have what's left of the Internet now so that you can supplement poor teaching materials.

As a Music Ed major, which is Education with extra classes tacked on, I would be interested to hear what GB history books are like once you guys get over there.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What more than that do most people need to know about Marbury v. Madison? What is the significance or relevance to day of the debates over it and the events leading up to it? Because I don't think that is anywhere near as important as the emphasis you place on it.

Knowing that judicial review is a thing and that SCOTUS can do it and why they have that power should be enough for most people.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Marbury v. Madison established judicial review, which allows the SC to strike down laws as unconstitutional.

That only gives the what and how of the situation, not the why. Some explanation of why they were given that power is useful for the average citizen

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Some explanation is not a dozen long online textbook pages. Especially when women as a whole in the 19th century rated four short pages.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hang on, this was online? Not a printed book? Ok yeah, a few paragraphs and a hyperlink should cover it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, textbooks are web-based for a lot of kids these days.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Got it. I majored in ME, and CS thankfully. I realized as soon as I graduated that schools are not a safe place for male teachers.

Just pointing out, I never said that 12 pages was appropriate, just that what you had specified was a bit too short.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago
[–] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Recently watched a drunk history episode about spies, one of the segments featured Harriet Tubman. Absolutely worth a watch, you can find it on YouTube free.

Did you know she was Americas first female military leader? I didn’t till I saw that! And I got a half decent education where they didn’t gloss over slavery (helps I grew up in NY).

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I would watch a whole movie with Octavia Butler as Drunk History Harriet Tubman. That shit was awesome.