this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
853 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3040 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump’s re-election has fueled a surge in misogynistic, homophobic, and racist rhetoric among young men, reportedly emboldened by the president-elect’s history of inflammatory remarks about women.

In schools, boys have been caught using phrases like “your body, my choice” against female peers, prompting districts like Minnesota’s Hopkins Public Schools to issue warnings to parents about harassment.

The impact extends beyond schools, with activists on Texas State University’s campus displaying signs asserting that “women are property.”

This hostile climate has left many women feeling unsafe as a new far-right administration takes power.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago (5 children)

the america the majority of americans want. sickening

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now we have both the middle east and the middle west

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't say that, the concept of the middle class is so that the poor people thing they have more money than other people and won't revolt

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who knew preventing a revolution was as easy as tying survival to a car payment?

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The important part is to make your subscription to your car and your subscription to your house a big enough part of your pay check, so that you are afraid if you use too much electricity your budget for your food will not be enough. For everyone else make sure they need Netflix, HBO, YouTube premium, reddit coins, and every thing else to get into the same situation

Then make it so you are afraid to lose your job because you can't save up for a rainy day fund.

Then be afraid of the rain

Now the rest is slowly boiling the frog, so you are used to it

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

*Majority of voting Americans

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not voting is a choice. Those 40% didn't give a shit.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those 40% are Nazi sympathizers. Or Nazi simps, if you will.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At the very minimum they are ok with Nazis so long as they don’t directly impact them, or they don’t think they will be directly impacted by them

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yep, that's a sympathizer.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

I am legit debating about quitting my job because my supervisor (in NJ) said that he didn’t vote because he didn’t like either candidates, he felt his Christian values were not embodied by either of the candidates. I just wanted to be like “bitch, how about at least vote against someone who spits at those values”. Up until now I respected him, I thought he was knowledgeable at work and just assumed that he would be knowledgeable about outside world too.

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

More like 22% when you look at the numbers. 40% of the electorate could give two shits who runs the country.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago

And people need to stop giving that 40% a free ride. They also wanted this. Fuck them.

We have the same issue in Ontario where our conservative leader Doug Ford won a majority with like 19% of Ontarians actually voting for him. This means for the majority of Ontarians they were comfortable sitting at home fingering their grandma. So fuck them yes they did want this.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They care, they just don't know.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

That's on them at this point

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They're equally culpable.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

A slim majority of voters. 68 million to 73 million last I checked. Not even a third of the population.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

5.5 million out of over 300 million is hardly a majority.

[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

More like 74.2 millions out of over 231 millions eligible to vote. Still not a majority, but the 86 millions who didn't vote are at least complicit. And 160 millions are a majority.