672
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 104 points 23 hours ago

Is the owner of the company purchasing a year's worth in order to keep the price they charge down, or in order to raise prices in February when their customers expect it because of the new tariffs, and pocket the difference? While having avoided paying bonuses?

[-] leisesprecher@feddit.org 110 points 23 hours ago

Obviously I don't know the business in question, but it's quite possible that the company has a bunch of longer running contracts that would become a loss if the inputs become much more expensive.

Of course, businesses will use the opportunity to charge more, but sudden price hikes are a very real problem.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 49 points 23 hours ago

This is almost certainly what's happening. The proposed tariffs will be very hard on American businesses and devastating for the consumer. It's quite literally a fairly severe tax on domestic companies and the American people. But, honestly, we could do with a less consumerism in this country. Unfortunately, it's likely to cause a tough economic downturn that will hurt poor people the most.

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 21 hours ago

that will hurt poor people the most.

As is tradition.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Be hilarious if Trump simultaneously collapses the economy and starts a green movement built around an inherent need for a second hand economy.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Stranger things have happened. Like him getting elected, for instance.

[-] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

And 20 million voters disappearing into thin air...

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Well, they didn't disappear into thin air. 12 million less people voted for Harris, so basically the democrats lost the election more than Trump won it. Trump got basically the same number of votes as he did against Biden.

[-] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

Yes that's what I meant though. Their votes disappeared. Our electronic voting machines have known first hand vulnerabilities.

I think they figured it out finally. They've been trying to gain access this entire time, and some Republican traitors are being prosecuted for it as we speak. Or were. I guess laws don't matter anymore since America is finished.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 42 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Large and small manufacturing companies have contracts for orders for months to years out with set prices, some of which might have wiggle room for costs but not to this extent. Plus manufacturing already tries to balance out costs across projects due to fluctuating prices for materials. If their materials double (or more) in price they will be screwed by the contracts and guaranteed to lose money on all of them.

Buying at the current prices means they will have to pay to have the materials stored in a warehouse, which will cut into their planned profits for those existing contracts. Hell, they might be buying at a higher cost than they normally would when fulfilling the contracts.

The company is getting screwed, not trying to fleece customers or their employees.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 15 points 22 hours ago

I'm pleasantly surprised how level headed the replies to that comment are.

[-] AcidOctopus@lemmy.ml 23 points 22 hours ago

Without having more detail I can't speak with certainty, but, general principles of inventory management and cash flow discourage having a surplus of stock, as that ties up a significant amount of working capital in the costs of storing and handling it all - you risk not being able to pay your liabilities because you've sunk all your funds into inventory that hasn't yet sold and generated more revenue.

Companies often have longer term contracts with specific prices agreed that can't always be easily changed. Those contacts could quite easily become unprofitable if there are sudden increases to the direct costs of fulfilling them. So, rather than trying to fuck customers, this company is likely trying to stock-up at current market prices to ride-out the first year of tariffs, but in doing so, needs a large injection of working capital to cover the expenditure (hence cancelling bonuses), and also puts itself in a very vulnerable position where cash flow is concerned by tying up that capital in inventory - any further sudden and unexpected costs could lead to the business folding.

[-] Djtecha@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago

But that's not even the point of this. It's not the company is greedy or not, it's this administration is causing this.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 18 points 22 hours ago

That's the thing though, most customers don't expect the price increase because they're fucking idiots who believes tariffs are good for the economy.

[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 17 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, this seems like those redhats need a union.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago
[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

Them: Make America Great Again!

So, like the 1950s?

Them: Yeah!

When corporate tax rates and union membership were much higher?

Them: Not like that!

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 9 points 23 hours ago

they'll pocket the difference, jack up prices, refuse bonuses next year, business slows, lay off half the staff, buy material on credit--maybe siphoning some of that off, bonuses are now a distant memory, jack prices up again. business slows to a crawl, lay off more. business falters. file bankruptcy with millions of outstanding debt to write off.

just like their diaper-wearing idol would.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 17 points 22 hours ago

Well you're 💯 correct on what Trumps would do!

As an individual small business owner however, they could have gotten caught in the squeeze between contracts and tariffs.

[-] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 4 points 19 hours ago

If they're reputable enough and tend to operate in good faith, they could be giving their customers time to prepare for the incoming price hike. They'll probably lose customers that can't afford to operate with the new price later on but the transparency would go a long way towards maintaining healthy business relations with the remaining customers.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

Does it matter? This wouldn't have happened without Trump being elected and the looking threat of tariffs. Whether the owner is using that as cover for jacking up the prices or not, it's still a LAMF moment.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago

Oh I don't disagree! I'm just wondering if the owner is face-eaten or face-eating. Small business owners are more varied than big business leopards.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

if anything like it happens in Turkey, most businesses will buy early, stockpile goods as prices keep increasing (increased effect of tariffs + shortage of goods in market) and release them to the market for a hefty profit

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Definitely the latter.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
672 points (97.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5699 readers
2413 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS