348
submitted 3 weeks ago by lohky@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

I've found that AI has done literally nothing to improve my life in any way and has really just caused endless frustrations. From the enshitification of journalism to ruining pretty much all tech support and customer service, what is the point of this shit?

I work on the Salesforce platform and now I have their dumbass account managers harassing my team to buy into their stupid AI customer service agents. Really, the only AI highlight that I have seen is the guy that made the tool to spam job applications to combat worthless AI job recruiters and HR tools.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Hey man, why are we using the internet, don't you see this is bad for the environment, while your at it. stop wearing clothes! Our ancestors were able to get by with just our body hair, we're ruining nature.

That's how I read the post above you.

[-] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes, exactly. And I don't even disagree with making things better on the environment. It's why I dislike LLMs being pushed into random things that don't really need it. And if more efficient models exist, they should preferably be used.

But using AI to make your life a little better also brings positives that outweigh that cost. And it seems like as a society we have much bigger polluters to take care of that use orders more electricity and water, and we already struggle massively doing just that. So it really feels like misdirected anger towards the unfairness in society (which the societal cost they mentioned also seems to point to) than a real criticism of AI. And I can understand that anger, but not the mindset behind the conclusions derived from it.

[-] Sergebr@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You are not aware of the cost (which has been widely documented) if you believe that.

[-] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Do feel free to explain what you mean and why, because this comment literally has nothing for me to even respond to.

EDIT: And if you meant the water cost, you can read my rationale on that here.

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

sounds like a frog in a saucepan.. sure is getting warmer!

[-] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The earth has been warming for decades at this point, even before AI. We know what causes climate change and AI has so far been a footnote on a large list of unsolved problems. The moment that changes I'll be right there with you, but I'm far more interested in taking down the companies that are largely responsible for it. This logic follows that just living life as a human is unethical because you can't be environmentally neutral in today's society, and I reject that notion.

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

its the speed of the change innit. for example, the fact that google power requirements has increase 50% in the last year must have a tremendous impact.

[-] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

And Google as one of the largest companies in the world should be held fully responsible for that. But Google isn't everyone. Google also has a huge amount of computers under their name, but does that mean everyone with a computer should be held to the same standards because it's the same technology?

If sweeping conclusions are going to be made about the technology, it has to be looked at outside of the context of a specific company and how they implement and use AI. Otherwise, it should be specified that this is a criticism of specific companies and how they use AI, and I'd be totally there agreeing with you in the case of Google.

[-] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

yeah, but it's all about how we use the technology. because we can absolutely find a solution to our climate problem by using what we have today. Tech is definitely a double edged sword and we're just using it wrong. all because of greed and corruption. And that's what we definitely need to solve, greed and corruption, and not go all Pol Pot on tech.

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
348 points (91.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27028 readers
376 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS