623
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
623 points (99.7% liked)
News
23627 readers
3812 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You can't prosecute the meth out of a redneck, America has tried for decades.
There are people who have the basic mammalian capability for aversion association, and people who don't, these morons are no more capable of learning than ants.
Don't bother trying to set an example, just use enforced attrition.
I'm sorry but what exactly do you mean by "enforced attrition".
If I were to run his statement through a different filter he's stating "it's in their genes and we need to kill them" but I don't think he wants to use those words.
Oh yeah, that's my thoughts as well. Which is weird, it's not usually something you run into in this context.
I think they're referring to using punishment less as a deterrent to potential future offenders and more as a way of getting the people who prove themselves incapable of living in a civil society off of the streets. I don't mean to speak for anyone, that was just my takeaway.
Which is suspiciously close to concentration camps.
You got to Godwin's Law territory in record time, there. I'm talking about throwing the book at literal fucking terrorists.
See that's setting an example, which Inverse Parallax specifically said they were done with. Do you see my problem here?
Also concentration camps are not Godwin's law territory, plenty of other countries have used them, including the US.
You know what image that kind of language invokes. It's also not germane to the issue either way, because I'm not talking about politically persecuting people, I'm talking about judicial expediency dealing with people who are committing actual crimes and using their political views as justification for it.
Uh huh, yeah. The crime here being... (Checks up thread) Living in a rural area.
Shitty strawman but I guess we can't expect much from the schools out there
And who are you? You're out here defending something awfully close to stochastic terrorism by assuming all the worst stuff about the people someone else was talking about. They literally said,
And you're out here like, they're obviously talking about the locking up criminals. And you blow right by the fact that long sentences are the traditional means of setting an example, it's already a thing to lock people up in way they never come back to the street, as an example. So what's next? What's further down the path? Beyond long sentences to set an example? Well your bestest buddy here uses the words, "enforced attrition." Let's have a look at the definitions for those words.
So we're going cause the reduction in strength of rednecks by force. And lest you think we would be talking about forcing them to eat less, this is a specific example in the dictionary for attrition,
So I don't know where you went to school, but at mine they taught us critical reading. And this reads like some shit Goebbels would say. And that's proving Godwin's Law.