797
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You don't need 5D chess to know that Trump would be worse. We have already seen it. Only last time he had sane people limiting his destruction. Now the lunatics are running the asylum.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We already saw that he didn't destroy democracy or start WW3. You can credit that to "sane people" limiting him but the fact is that what we saw wasn't the Fourth Reich. It was just a shitty Republican president.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

The first cyanide pill didn't kill me, so the second won't either...

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 weeks ago

Alternatively, the sky didn't fall last time so it probably won't fall this time.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

If you remember that parable, the sky actually did fall that last time.

Also, for the 1.2 million Americans who died from Covid, the sky did fall last time.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 weeks ago

If you remember the lesson of that parable, no one believes the chicken when the sky falls and the chicken has no one to blame but himself. You can't keep saying it's the most important election of our lifetimes because we stop believing it.

And maybe the sky falls this time, but it's the chicken's fault that we don't believe it.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

The lesson is also not to ignore a message of obvious danger because the messenger is flawed.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 weeks ago

That's definitely not why people use Chicken Little as an Aesop. The lesson is that if you lie over and over, people won't believe you when it matters.

I certainly don't.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Then judge by actions, not words. Since you care so much about Palestinians, how about voting for a candidate that is part of an administration that allows them to seek asylum in the US like Harris. Meanwhile Trump's whole thing is expelling immigrants and he initiated a Muslim ban the last time he was in office. Surely saving some Palestinians vs saving none is worth a vote?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago

Would you vote for half your family to be killed so the other half could maybe be spared? How do you choose which family members get to live and die? How would you live with yourself.

I plan to resist whoever is elected. Maybe you'll join me, instead of just waiting another four years to vote again.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

In this scenario there is no third option where nobody dies. Either half your family dies or they all die. Sometimes all the power you have is saving who you can.

By all means, resist whoever is elected. Harris would cause fewer problems to fight over. By letting Trump win, you're just making it harder on everyone.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago

What you can do is take your struggle outside the ballot box, because there's no hope in electoralism. No matter who wins we can defeat them, and at least if Trump wins the liberals will join us instead of just sitting around at home to wait for the next election.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

There is hope for the Palestinians who would be given asylum under Harris, but apparently your ego is more important to you than they are.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh so it's okay to exterminate the population of Gaza as long as a few are able to escape to the US.

Also, have you noticed that Palestinians aren't being given asylum right now?

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Not voting won't stop the genocide. Voting might. Simple as that.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 weeks ago

Voting for genocide won't stop genocide either. Harris has made it abundantly clear that she will support Israel no matter what.

The only recourse for us is to defeat the US.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

As you said, you can defeat the US regardless of who wins, but if Harris wins Palestinians will have more options to take refuge.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Palestinians aren't being given asylum right now. Trump just said the quiet part out loud.e

And honestly, I'm pessimistic about us being able to resist Harris. We certainly failed to resist Biden. It can certainly be done, but there's a gulf of difference between "we can do it" and "we will do it." That's why I also pointed out that if Trump wins the liberals will join us instead of just sitting around at home to wait for the next election.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

So you won't even lift a finger to take a chance of saving Palestinians. You'll just sit on your couch and let them die.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Red fascists despise minorities and will do everything in their power to ensure we suffer.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 weeks ago

I won't lift a finger to vote for genocide. You can twist yourself into ideological knots to convince yourself that voting for genocide will save Palestinians, but I see the truth. The only chance Palestinians have is if the US and Israel are defeated.

Which president is more likely to lose against the Axis of Resistance?

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Neither is going to lose. People are too comfortable. They have too much to lose to join a fight like that. Its delusional to think otherwise.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The largest protest movement in US history happened under Trump. People aren't that comfortable, and you yourself probably believe Trump is going to make a lot of people very uncomfortable.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

And that protest movement accomplished nothing.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They burned a police station down. That's not something people do when they're too comfortable.

It was a revolutionary moment, there just wasn't an organized political force or party to take control of the situation and push forward an agenda. It was merely more of the same leaderless horizonalism that characterized the 2010s. That shit doesn't work, but that doesn't mean nothing else was possible. We won't have a revolution just because people are uncomfortable. It requires organizing, which is what we should be doing right now and immediately after Trump steals the election.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

They were uncomfortable because of Covid. That's not likely to happen again soon. They were the most widespread protests this country has had since Vietnam (at least) and they accomplished nothing. The government has those kinds of protests figured out and can crush them or make them irrelevant. Nothing is going to change until people are willing to risk their own lives.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
797 points (86.2% liked)

BestOfLemmy

7239 readers
1 users here now

Manual curation of great Lemmy discussions and threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS