Israel says it's conducting 'precise strikes on military targets' in Iran (www.bbc.com)

submitted 1 week ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Sundial@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Iran made it clear that if the attack was contained, than they would let it be. If not, then they retaliate.

If they do intend to retaliate, I don't expect it happening before the election. They know these kinds of things help Trump and the last thing they want is a Trump presidency.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

My problem is that I don't trust Israel's claim that this was precise and I also don't trust Iran's claim that if it is contained, they won't retaliate.

Because I don't trust either government at all.

[-] Sundial@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Trust them to serve their own self interests.

Israel's interest is escalating and prolonging the conflict to grab more land and kill more Arabs and Persians.

Iran's interest is de-escalation since they're in no shape to fight a war with Israel, and the US.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You could be right in general, but you should know that Iranians are not Arabs and they hate being mistaken for Arabs.

http://www.us-iran.org/resources/2016/10/21/myth-vs-fact-persians-and-arabs

[-] Sundial@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Forgot about that lol, thanks for reminding me. I've edited my comment.

[-] Sami@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think they said they would not retaliate against a limited attack though that might end up being the case depending on the nature and scale of the damages.

[-] Sundial@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

They did say it.

If Israeli strikes — a response to a barrage of missiles from Iran earlier this month — inflict widespread damage and high casualties, they said, Iran will retaliate. But if Israel limits its attack to a few military bases and warehouses storing missiles and drones, Iran might well do nothing.

The officials said Ayatollah Khamenei had directed that a response would be certain if Israel strikes oil and energy infrastructure or nuclear facilities, or if it assassinates senior officials.

They made the terms clear. Now we see if Israel abides by them. My guess is no.

[-] Sami@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Different statements were made in the past month:

Iran's General Staff of the Armed Forces said in a statement carried by state media that any Israeli response would be met with "vast destruction" of Israeli infrastructure.

I believe the Iranian ambassador said something of the same vein at the UN security council meeting as well. Either way I still agree that they likely wont respond to this type of limited strike as things currently stand.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024

58 points (82.2% liked)

World News

38948 readers

1484 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.