7
submitted 1 year ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/humanities@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lyam23@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Why not? Ethical or moral values have about as much bearing on the scientific outcome as how attractive the researchers are.

[-] insurgenRat@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Ok so assuming good faith:

There's a huge cohort of idiot savant type technologists that are obsessed with the idea of machine consciousness and the incredibly important implications of that (according to them). Yet these same people by and large absolutely refuse to engage in any behaviour modification regarding the incredibly strong evidence of consciousness we find in extant earthlings. Human and non human.

So I can't take their claims of being interested this any more seriously than a teenager's musings on the meaning of life because they don't actually believe anything they're saying.

Knowledge without belief in it is not knowledge, it is mere rhetoric and wordplay.

If you care about machine consciousness and think it would carry any weight or demand modification of our behaviour you would already be acting with urgency against humanitarian crises and animal agriculture.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Humanities & Cultures

2532 readers
1 users here now

Human society and cultural news, studies, and other things of that nature. From linguistics to philosophy to religion to anthropology, if it's an academic discipline you can most likely put it here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS