Facepalm

3383 readers

588 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

irelephant@lemmy.world

The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world

irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com

525

The future is now (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/facepalm@lemmy.world

140 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] niucllos@lemm.ee 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think she's using it less as therapy and more as a way to win arguments is the problem

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I'm thinking the poster could easily use chatGPT the same way as his opponent, there is no advantage to one side or the other here.

The main value in introducing a third party (which in this case is software) is to take ego out of an argument and start arguing against a problem rather than a person. This is why I referred to it as therapy. chatGPT is an echo chamber of human writing with a few guardrails, much like speaking with an impartial therapist.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

If your partner is an "opponent" in an argument, then you've lost the plot of your relationship. It's you and your partner against the issue, not against each other.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 10 months ago

Not if he's vegan. Vegans can't use ChatGPT.