68
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
68 points (98.6% liked)
technology
23236 readers
119 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Women are not allowed pockets of any sort, whether they be on shirts or pants. Or something.
My chud family member says "women chose to have pocketless clothing because that's what they buy"
This chud is an adult woman who believes in traditionalism, watches Matt Walsh etc. but has a child out of wedlock. The contradictions are endless.
It’s of a similar vein with republicans who want abortion banned but sneak away in the dead of night to have their love child aborted. The disconnect is there and it is fucking real.
WHY?
The mind bottles
Chuds are evil, evil people.
Women’s clothes are not intended for hiding witchcraft within!
My 1.5yr old has more functional pockets in his wardrobe then my wife does.