102
submitted 2 months ago by Bunny19@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

What's wrong with Ubuntu/Mint/PopOS/Fedora or any of the distros usually recommended? They're easier to maintain and more up to date than Debian

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I wouldn't call them up to date but they are a little newer than Debian with the exception of Pop OS.

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago

wouldn't call them up to date

they are a little newer

Huh

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago

What is confusing? It is newer than Debian but still fairly out of date compared to Fedora or the latest Ubuntu release

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
102 points (97.2% liked)

Linux

48654 readers
365 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS