40
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

I mean there is shitton of artifacts and treasures left from the original owners of ruins, often lying just plainly in sight. You think someone go into the ruins and not only don't take the jewels and incredibly expensive looking shiny weapons and armor but also leave their own food and money? And repair the very aggressive centurions or reraise draugr they would need to destroy to get into the place first time?

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The true answer is that the actual set pieces are bullshit because they very easy to access for the most part yet are supposed to be completely unexplored and have a lot of anachronisms laying around. todd

As i said, dragon breaks. Second Era had millions of adventurers being the same person adventuring all at the same time. What is some food and cash in dungeons compared to this.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

Yes I know all about dragon breaks. My point is that dragon breaks are the writing equivalent of "I give up" even if they're conceptually funny.

Yeah, quite useful actually, somehow it sounds way better than when for example Games Workshop have to explain 143523425 hole in the lore with "it's chaos i don't have to explain things" or just do a retcon. Despite being basically just the equivalent of "it's chaos i don't have to explain things".

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

games

20444 readers
570 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS