Antiwork
A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.
The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml
This server is no longer working, and we had to move.
Active stats from all instances
Subscribers: 2.1k
Date Created: June 21, 2023
Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads
Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.
- The Abolition of Work by Bob Black (1985) | listen
- On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs by David Graeber (2013) | listen
- In Praise of Idleness by Bertrand Russell (1932) | listen
c/Antiwork Rules
Tap or click to expand
1. Server Main Rules
The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/
2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments
Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.
Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.
3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved
Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.
4. Educate don’t attack
No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.
If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.
5. No Advertising
Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service
6. No factually misleading information
Content that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.
7. Headlines
If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.
8. Staff Discretion
Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.
It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.
Other Communities
Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/
view the rest of the comments
Until you realize that in your praised Europe with the universal healthcare this is presicely how it works.
If you want cash instead of benefits go become a contractor.
I can't possibly see where on an antiwork sub I could even begin to explain why employment laws and health insurances exist instead of everyone just getting plain cash for their labor. If you don't know that, you're not qualified to be antiwork.
I'm from a place in Europe. Had complicated surgery recently. I technically made money from it. And once the scar and minor disability is calculated, I'll probably make even more. To put things in perspective, I mean.
It's not a lot of money and certainly not worth it. I'm just making a point that I financially go positive rather than negative. The money comes from a private insurer that makes money every year. I'm pretty sure they are on top of things. This is not some advanced insurance scam; it's the realisation that an accident is something to be compensated for and not punished for. No-one wants to be in an accident (edge cases blah blah).
Damn it's really that cheap?
You're kidding me, right? I lived in a few of those "best healthcare in the world" countries, and I was paying 400-600€ per month. Forcefully. By law.
The healthcare costs afterwards are much lower than in the US exactly because this system exists. But neither OP nor you have even the basics right on how and why those markets are shaped to be this way.
Instead you live in a fairytale world where in the US an evil employer deducted 600$ from your paycheck to pay for your health insurance, while in some universal healthcare countries it's just "free".
So, funnily enough, there's as usual here an army of lemmings upvoting your BS and downvoting me. While the healthcare in Europe is affordable specifically because the government forcefully takes about 600$ out of your paycheck and gives to the insurance. And neither you nor the employer have any chance to say no to that.
They pay $600 a month for insurance and STILL pays doctor bills. I also pay 600 a month and my yearly max out of pocket is $2500 per family member. In the EU the pay nothing other than taxes(maybe some small fees but not much at all) And from searching a few websites the max you will pay in Germany is 7.3 percent of your income capped at €62100 for a max monthly insurance cost of €377.77($420.70 USD)
So, you're saying anyone in Germany with an above average salary is forced to pay 400$ out of their salary for their healthcare insurance? Isn't this exactly what OP complains about, or can you not logic at all?
Did I or OP say anything about out-of-pocket? Do you actually know anything about the insurance market and do you realize that your co-pays are only that low because this forced system exists?
looks like it's not only our US friends who knows jack shit about how universal healthcare works
P.s. you pulled 7% number out of your ass. It's exactly as I explained the "visible" part of the deductible. The actual number is precisely double, again as explained.
So, in total you might have a salary of 50k and you'll see 300 being deducted every month. Even though in fact the employer will have to also pay 300 to the insurance, making your actual gross salary 53.5k, and the actual deductible to be 600€.
I wanna see Lemmy's face when they'll realize this is not a singular incident and with all the various social security systems and taxes combined they'll end up with receiving on their bank account some 40-45% of what left their employer bank account to keep them employed.
But oh boy "600$ got deducted, corporate fascism, our USA is broken, please go look at the universal healthcare countries it's soo much better, I promise".
It actually is if you're poor. And if you're somewhere, where your deductible is 600$, you would've been much better off with an American system. Might not be ideal from a societal point of view, but you as an individual who has the means to use a 600$/m private insurance will absolutely be much better off.
And, so, believe it or not, Americans on those private corporate plans get a much, much better healthcare than folks in the same salary range enjoying the universal healthcare.
And if you don't understand how, why, and what's at play behind regulated and deregulated health insurance markets, then you do not qualify to be anti-work.
When I do my annual determination of the best plan, I always look at my total cost if I maxed out copays and deductible. Even as an old fart, HSA looks incredibly cheap because the premiums are so low. How ever, in many circumstances I don't reach my out of pocket limits.
Why don't you try? I'm sure you'd do a bang-up job explaining.
It's kinda like this: you walk dogs for a living, you vote left hoping that they'll come to power and print a lot of money and just pay for everything you need, one day your dream comes true and you wake up in Venezuela.
And as to why all sane countries have a forced universal healthcare insurance that will deduct from your paycheck exactly as OP described, and will do as an obligation by law, you can consider me copy-pasting this thing as an explanation:
https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.31.4.23