87
submitted 2 months ago by someone@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

The company has updated its FAQ page to say that private chats are no longer shielded from moderation.

Telegram has quietly removed language from its FAQ page that said private chats were protected from moderation requests. The change comes nearly two weeks after its CEO, Pavel Durov, was arrested in France for allegedly allowing “criminal activity to go on undeterred on the messaging app.”

Earlier today, Durov issued his first public statement since his arrest, promising to moderate content more on the platform, a noticeable change in tone after the company initially said he had “nothing to hide.”

“Telegram’s abrupt increase in user count to 950M caused growing pains that made it easier for criminals to abuse our platform,” he wrote in the statement shared on Thursday. “That’s why I made it my personal goal to ensure we significantly improve things in this regard. We’ve already started that process internally, and I will share more details on our progress with you very soon.”

Translation: Durov is completely compromised and will do whatever NATO tells him to do. Do not trust in the security of Telegram, which frankly was never that good to begin with. And do not trust anything else even remotely connected to the company or Durov personally.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago

They never were and never advertised as such. There's secret chat's that only work from the originating device to the receiving device that are e2e.

Group chats were never encrypted because they're convenience chats, not places to tell secrets. IE you can look back at all the history and shared files from any device you log into. You can search for a message from 2 years ago to remember something that was discussed previously.

I'm a big telegram defender because it's the nicest cross platform chat app to stop your parents from creating the n+1th mms group chat from their iphones, torturing all android users. It's also not a Meta app, and doesn't have the nerd requirements of an actual encrypted chat.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago
[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

Lol and Telegram seems to be throwing in the towel.

Telegram is also CIA

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Have you used both of them?

Signal UI/UX is like using a cheap SMS app. This is a big deal for getting people to use it.

It doesn't sync to other devices (it does, but it's manual).

Telegram I can grab the device in front of me and it shows exactly what is on any other device.

As does any XMPP chat.

Alternatively there's Teleguard, by SwissCows. They claim e2e for all comms, noting stored on their servers. It's like using Telegram.

Have you used both of them?

Yes, I really like the Signal UX. It does everything I need it to and very few pointless gimmicks. Telegram feels a lot more scuffed and further from a normal SMS app. Granted I've never used either on desktop.

[-] coolusername@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Signal is CIA. Stop promoting it.

[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

I use it for work and I find it clunky and an overall mid messaging experience. It feels like groupme from 7 years ago. I know the "nothing to hide trope" is shit, but sometimes you actually are saying little of substance and you want a nice user experience day-to-day rather than sacrifice features and UX for a privacy boogieman.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
87 points (95.8% liked)

technology

23277 readers
143 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS