430
submitted 1 year ago by mayflower@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 63 points 1 year ago

Krita is closer to Photoshop than Gimp, although still not up to it. Just in case you ever need PS, try krita first.

[-] MrMamiya@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Thanks I’ll remember that just in case!

[-] scorpious@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Photopea is good for most tasks

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Krita is excellent for painting, not very good for image editing though.

[-] NathanUp@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Hard disagree. I use it all the time for photo editing.

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Well, there's better tools out there

[-] NathanUp@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Again, just my opinion, but I prefer Krita to any FLOSS alternative. I've been designing professionally for over a decade, using Adobe for most of it; Krita is my preferred FLOSS tool for photo editing, and I've tried them all.

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I'm surprised, I never managed to use it efficiently for that purpose. Perhaps AffinityPhoto spoiled me a bit. I love Krita for illustration work though, nothing compares... As far as commercial alternatives go, I haven't tried Clip Paint although everybody praises it- but I don't really feel the need to. Apparently it's excellent?

[-] NathanUp@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Yea, the workflow is a bit different. Not having a concept of fill opacity as separate from layer opacity forced me to change the way I do certain things, and having certain retouching tools grouped with the brushes was confusing at first.

For years, I didn't use anything besides Adobe CC, because it's "industry standard," so I've never given anything like Affinity a go in earnest.

With all FLOSS design tools, I had to have a bit of a reckoning with myself; like most people, at first I thought they were unintuitive, until I was able to have a bit of objectivity and found that most of the issues I had with them didn't arise because they were unintuitive; it was just because they didn't work like Adobe tools, which are themselves complex tools that you really can't just pick up on your own without some degree of instruction.

[-] zer0@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago

Krita has g'mic and it's open source. It's photoshop that is still not up to there

[-] CybranM@feddit.nu 1 points 1 year ago

Krita is a drawing program not really a photo editor like PS/Gimp. Paint.net was a pretty good PSlite last time I tried it

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
430 points (95.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43946 readers
660 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS