this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
202 points (99.5% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2515 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

LONDON (AP) — Britain’s new left-leaning government said Sunday that the nation is “broke and broken,” blaming the situation on its predecessors ahead of a major speech on the state of the public finances that is widely expected to lay the groundwork for higher taxes.

In a sweeping assessment three weeks after taking power, Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s office professed shock at the situation they inherited after 14 years of Conservative Party rule, while releasing a department-by-department analysis of the perceived failures of the previous government.

The critique comes a day before Treasury chief Rachel Reeves is expected to outline a 20-billion-pound ($26 billion) shortfall in public finances during a speech to the House of Commons.

“We will not shy away from being honest with the public about the reality of what we have inherited,’’ Pat McFadden, a senior member of the new Cabinet, said in a statement. “We are calling time on the false promises that British people have had to put up with and we will do what it takes to fix Britain.”

Starmer’s Labour Party won a landslide election victory earlier this month following a campaign in which critics accused both major parties of a “conspiracy of silence” over the scale of the financial challenges facing the next government.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And people will be angry at the leftists for telling them that it will cost money to fix shit and they'll vote the right back in power so they can fuck things up even more? 😱

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I kind of hate that the US "founding fathers" were kind of right in their assessment that the "common person" is wayyyyyy too fucking stupid and too easily swayed by propaganda to be trusted to vote.

I can't say I agree with their conclusion that only rich people deserve to vote though. Not sure what the right path is :(

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's a very slippery slope. Clearly land/business owners, race, gender, etc are not the way.

Political fluency? A test to see if you've been following current events and can answer basic questions? The positives would be a more informed pool of electorates, but it would also substantially diminish the amount of voters, exclude those that have grievances but don't have time for politics, and the questions could be manipulated by the current government to exclude voters likely to vote for the opposition.

I also don't know what the answer is. I'm leaning towards this being a symptom of dysfunction rather than something that needs an easy workaround. If we can actually tackle poverty and bring education up people will be much more likely to vote rationally, but I don't know how we get there WITH thr current system we have.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Political fluency? A test to see if you’ve been following current events and can answer basic questions? The positives would be a more informed pool of electorates, but it would also substantially diminish the amount of voters, exclude those that have grievances but don’t have time for politics, and the questions could be manipulated by the current government to exclude voters likely to vote for the opposition.

The test:

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[–] Schal330@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Given the state the last government was run by Tories, I hope it will be a long time before we see them get into power again.