106

Sources: Elhacham et al. (2020), Hackney et al. (2021), UNEP (2022)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Since the graphic claims microchips are made out of "sand", I will call silica "sand". To get a spoon full of "sand", some random internet sources suggests that it would weigh about 33g, and apparently oats is quite dense in "sand", so youd need about 176 kg of oats, or about 27,000 spoonfulls of oats to satisfy your diet of "sand". Impressive!

(Or maybe you just eat it raw as a anti-caking agent?)

[-] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 9 points 3 months ago

spoonful

anything but the metric system

[-] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I was using a metric tablespoon for my calculations (15ml)

[-] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

using volumes for dry powders is unacceptable

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

It’s okayish if they’re really dry.

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

But for small amounts, particle size and container shape can have an effect, no?

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Container shape is important for small amounts and error from particle size scales linearly with the amount.

If we’re talking cooking flours, particle size tends to be somewhat uniform, and container shape don’t make much of a difference, humidity being the heavy hitter when it comes to density variation.

[-] ZarkleFarkle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

Best thing to make out of sand is triangles or hexagons that can perform collaborative energy transactions, like bees.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
106 points (99.1% liked)

Data is Beautiful

852 readers
7 users here now

Be respectful

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS