89
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
89 points (98.9% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
54420 readers
198 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Wow he's facing 48 years in prison for distributing some ones and zeros on the internet. A DEA agent recently ran over and killed a mother riding her bicycle near me after running a stop sign to catch up to his buddies and the courts ruled that he's immune from being held liable for his actions.
Funny how justice works in the US.
It's not just the US, trust me. One horribly true fact of life is justice only works for those who can afford it.
Law is not Justice
From what I understand he created a streaming site with over 200TB of content, and made several million dollars selling access to it.
While 48 years is a ridiculously draconian sentence, he wasn't exactly an amateur pirate seeding his torrents too much or giving too many friends access to his Plex. He broke the one rule we all know will get your shit turned upside down: he directly profited off of piracy.
And he did it all using domestic web services inside the USA where he has zero legal protection...
I'm not so keen on fighting for this guy, because what he did isn't comparable to even the most impressive Jellyfin admins on this sub, and he had awful opsec. If anything just learn a lesson from this guy and just maintain your own little personal archive for entertainment purposes.
Victim blaming.
Victim? He did something he knew was illegal. How is he the victim in any way? Should it be illegal? I dunno, but it is. That's the end of it.
Dismissing something just because it's digital is pretty stupid.
I think the sentence is very extreme but there are a LOT of crimes and maybe serious ones that can be summed up to "did stuff with ones and zeros".
While that's true, this ain't really one of them. I don't really support for profit piracy, but when juxtaposed against negligently taking a life, it's insane to see the disparity between the punishments.
Police and courts exist to serve the state's interests, not the interests of that state's citizens. Those interests can diverge a great deal. Doesn't change in a democracy, it's just not about us.