superniceperson

Nobody has ever been forced to live. Its a choice you make.

That nonsense argument aside, the digital world objectively cannot be legislated like the physical world. Otherwise I'd have stolen more money than has ever been printed or designated. It doesn't make sense to treat digital objects like physical ones, mainly because they share nothing in common.

Pretending like the government needs to know what you jack off to, or pretending that some random megacorp needs a photo of you or your is to keep kids safe is ridiculous on so many levels.

This isnt about buying alcohol, this is about giving the government warrantless access to all of your information for enjoying your own sexuality.

There is no reasonable way to implement this as a law; is the argument against it.

Either everyone gets tracked by the government openly (which also means your browsing history can be accessed by a foia) or private companies get access to personal information they shouldn't have.

Neither case prevents all access points of porn, but both would require fundamental changes to society itself, as well as internet infrastructure, and would forever isolate any and all states that are stupid enough to implement these requirements.

So yes, kids shouldn't have access to porn. Parents and people in those kids lives are responsible for that, not big daddy government.

If we learn nothing else from the fall of the US we can learn that you do not willingly give the government more power or information.

Its cute you have your own call out forum for people that disagree with your neoliberal generic beliefs and all; one that only you post to or really participate in bar a few lost /all viewers, but that's not an argument.

People being upset that their livelihoods are being destroyed while their previous bosses become immeasurably richer while doing even less work were objectively on the right side of history given where it has lead us-- with the greatest wealth disparity in all of known human history, and the most people food and shelter insecure in all of human history.

None of the good ones that have lasted. Only disposable trash that needs to be nearly entirely rebuilt every 50 years.

The luddites were unironically entirely correct and capitalist disenfranchisement of capital has made the world objectively worse despite the wealth it brought to 0.001% of the population.

Why? Its not like apartments are built by private industry. Not any lasting ones at least.

Yes, yes it is.

Defending the weak and oppressed is a core pillar of Islam. Its not hypocritical .

According to Pew, around 63% of men under 30 are single, with 32% of all men being single (and about half are married.). Around 57% of all US single adults surveyed (with about equal distribution of men and women) say they're not looking to date at all. That's a majority of men that are simply not on the market. Only 42% of single people are looking for romance at all. And the reason I single out men is because between men and women, men who ARE looking to date are looking for serious relationships, where as women are not. (based on majority responses.)

I'm sorry you are so sheltered that everyone that doesn't conform to your narrow set of experiences is an incel, but the truth is most men aren't dating.

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/

In about 25 years most countries will be warzones and anyone that cant afford whatever the elite are charging for the few freshwater sources left on the planet will be dead or enslaved. anyone within twenty degrees of the equator will have fled or be dead, and anyone living above ground anywhere else will live in nonpermanent shelters due to the yearly storms that destroy standing structure.

boomers will be taking the worlds habitable range with them, and leaving us with a nightmare.