sup

joined 1 month ago
[–] sup@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is most likely a nothingburger, because other age groups have the same rate of emigration willing people. In German: https://tube.funfacts.de/w/uV2VJ1XmsG2MMgqQTekmFD Edit: machine translation of the video transcript: There are many quality criteria for scientific studies.

Can the results be representatively applied to the average society? How were the methods evaluated? That’s what we wanted to directly verify with this youth trend study. But you have to buy it on the authors website for €73.90. That’s €73 more than I earn today. And they’d probably also deduct the 9 cents for the glass of tap water. Join the gang! What we did find out for free on the study aurhors website. The study—the author seems quite proud of it—is known, among other things, from Lanz und Brecht and Gemischtes Hack. Those are actually nice podcasts, at least one of them. But still nothing I’d use to promote my scientific credibility. I might as well have the Amigos sing my study. We tried to find a license-free photo of Markus Lanz, but mostly found photos he uploaded to Wiki Comments. So, here’s our photo with Markus Lanz. He photographs a lot of birds—I don’t know why. We have different audiences and different platforms. So, to all the young women on Instagram and TikTok, we see you, we hear you. And to all the old men on YouTube, Lanz und Brecht is not a science podcast. The €73.90 also includes appealing infographics. We didn’t have the money for that, so we just made up an infographic. This study is basically the Galileo of scientific works. So, let’s get back to emigration. 21 percent of young people want to emigrate according to this trend study. That’s the same as the national average. Pretty wild, if you ask me. Average is already wild. Or, to put it in terms for Galileo viewers, that’s ten football fields in Saarland.

[–] sup@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Also they own the production side which could be a big problem. If you compare it to music streaming, where every streaming service nearly has the same music, the competition isn't based on the product but on the available content. That gives more power to the big corporations, because you also have to accept with their streaming deal if you produce with them. Also it promotes piracy that harms the creatives payout from streamers. And possibly the quality of content suffers as the streamers want mass content to draw the most people to their service. If the movie producers could sell to all streaming services simultaneous the competition would only be based on the service. Meaning Price, streaming quality, amount of ads and additional services would be a much bigger selling point.

[–] sup@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Hauptziel” des Abkommens “die Gegenseitigkeit beim Informationsaustausch”

Die Gegenleistung ist nicht fair für die Bürger, aber für die Behörden. Denn das würde bedeuten sie dürfen gegenseitig ihre Bürger ausspionieren lassen. Praktisch, weil die eigenen darf man ja offiziell nicht massenhaft überwachen, aber keiner kann es verbieten Tipps von anderen anzunehmen.

[–] sup@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hauptziel” des Abkommens “die Gegenseitigkeit beim Informationsaustausch”

Das heißt die nehmen die Spionage in Kauf, wenn sie dafür die US-Bürger ausspionieren dürfen.