stown

The Constitution says nothing about them being charged. It talks about them "engaging" in that behavior but there is no requirement for being charged with or convicted of that behavior. The Supreme Court is making this all up as they go.

When I say illegal immigrants I'm talking about the way they entered the country. Illegal is an adverb in this situation because it describes the way they immigrated.

In the future I'll try to use "illegally immigrating persons" so as to make this absurdly clear.

It is very telling when the laws are used to dissuade and punish the illegal immigrants for working instead of the companies and corporations for hiring them. If you make illegal labor unprofitable then you will largely get rid of it.

Probably just wanted to end his suffering...who am I kidding.

Well you're definitely slinging a bunch of bullshit around without any proof so why not just STFU? When you are getting massive downvotes for your incorrect claims you double-down and start calling names?! This is a clear sign of somebody who isn't worth listening to or their ideas/opinions worth regarding.

You've been spending too much time around conservatives.

Fresh Graphene. In order to get stock Android back you would need to install it back on your phone. A factory reset removes all data, settings, and apps that were put on the phone by the user.

Then why make the claim as if it were fact?

In order to prove this you would need a huge sample poll from each religion and it would need to be representative of the size of each flavor. Then and only then could you begin to make that kind of generalized statement.

Judging a group of people by one of its members is wrong, it's the same form of prejudice.

It seems like reading comprehension is not what it used to be.

"Much like" == "very similar too" AKA, "close, but no cigar"

You wouldn't compare something to the same something, that's kind of the point of comparisons.