It is an unfortunate thumbnail.
How do you even make 20,000 amendments to an 18 page document? Did they change every word individually?
The version of Neuralink we can afford will be ad supported.
And the rest overestimate how much they know.
Anarchism is when disc golf.
This article poses a Yes or No question in its headline, then takes 1500 words to answer it with "Maybe, sort of by some metrics, but not in any way that matters. I don't know only time will tell."
It includes Millennials in its statistics about Gen Z by referencing "under 30's" (the youngest Millennials are currently 28) and includes a comparison of Gen Z to both "middle aged" people and Millennials, which overlap, the oldest Millennials are 43. So it's comparing young millennials to middling millennials and saying they're actually more like old millennials.
I wish I hadn't read it. My bad though, I should have known. Articles that generalize people into categories as broad as generations are always poorly written.
It can do wonders. I have a (semi) quarterly ritual - one I'll be partaking in soon to coincide with the Vernal Equinox - of taking a large dose of psilocybin and diving into my own psyche for an afternoon. Its hard to explain the way it helps to change thought patterns.
With the right set going in you can really see the harmful ruts you've fallen into, recognize their manifestations and reroute. My last trip, during the winter solstice, snapped me out of a depressive episode I'd been battling for a year. It helped me see that I'd been spending my time and effort trying to live a life I'd long since stopped being excited for, for reasons unrelated to my depression, and it helped me feel empathy towards myself, so I could move forward on a new path, at peace.
It wouldn't have happened had I not been working on getting myself out of that rut for weeks prior through art, self reflection and seeking support, but it truly came to fruition after breaking down the barriers of my mind, destroying my ego for an afternoon, travelling through time and space and coming out the other side renewed.
Trying to get out on a technicality.
I was on that Jury, we were instructed repeatedly on avoiding bias when looking at the proceedings - keep our perceptions of their guilt out of it, only consider what is in evidence, don't let your emotional response sway you.
I wound up taken off the jury before the verdict (me, two other jurors, and the jury officer tested positive for COVID at the start of the final week of the trial) but everyone else got that same spiel and likely more when it came time for deliberation. It's rich to say "the jury just didn't understand what they were supposed to do!" as a defense here. We did. That's why the Bilodeaus were only found guilty on one count of murder and three counts of manslaughter - prosecution started off seeking second degree murder for all four counts. They both received light sentences for causing the deaths of two innocent men because the rule of law demanded it.
"Cyberpunks" weren't warning us about the internet - they were warning us about the corporations who will control it, and through it, us. We are trying explicitly not to communicate on that medium by using Lemmy (that medium encompasses Reddit, X, the various properties of Meta and Alphabet)
Science fiction mentioning a technology, even centering around it, doesn't mean it's saying the technology is universally bad. The author highlights the dangers, but the tech itself is almost always portrayed as neutral. It's the people who use it to nefarious ends that science fiction is warning us about.
Like the people who would seek to profit off of the Torment Nexus.
I came to the comments for an explanation because I completely missed the age labels, so thank you.
"The dog... was shot and killed during an 'Interaction'" is such an outlandishly vague way to describe the situation and leaves all details up to the imagination. It doesn't even say if that interaction was with their suspect. A suspect who "is injured" but like, did they injure the guy or did they injure themselves? Did they get shot too? Did the dog try to attack them and was shot by the suspect? Did the dog run at them, and a cop shot at the same time, killing the dog instead of maiming the suspect?
Cops always use passive language so it sounds like all this violence was already there when they showed up.
Forty years... forty... years... I wonder if there was something *new *that our liberal democracy started forty years ago, where the focus shifted towards expanding economic growth at all costs.
New and different but still liberal. Neo maybe.