schipelblorp

joined 1 day ago

I was on a music education sub and so many of the comments were "what's the best first instrument" with almost no context; meanwhile there was a faq with all the information. I once decided to troll the sub and made a post, "what's the best instrument? i mean, in general?" and lots of people chimed in--some with jokey ones, but others really earnestly wanting to help someone profoundly lazy....

The flip side of that is subs where people are just sick of beginner questions and heaven help you if you can't find your answer online because of enshittification.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

Damn, congrats bro! I kind of imagine that being anti-Zionist puts you on the fast-track to all of your comments getting reported... whether it changes how reddit addresses you is a different question.

Just checked out this HILARIOUS line from their harassment policy:

This policy is designed to protect people from targeted personal abuse, not to shield ideas, beliefs, organizations, or public figures from criticism, even if it's harsh.

In my case, they shielded the public figure of Bill Maher, the beliefs of Zionists, and the subreddit mods--so 0/3 at actually honestly enforcing their policy.

I posted the Blursed Torso of Elon Musk and it got shadowbanned, then reversed, and I never found out what that was about... but there was plenty of Musk-hate to go around on reddit, but I think you may have been an early adopter. I was an active on a hilarious ironic sub making fun of Musk and Muskheads, but it quickly lost its sense of humor; because I'm a craftsman who takes his art seriously and respects his audience, I refused to /s my comments and almost all my comments fell victim to Poe's Law. Very annoying.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

I'm here, ain't I?

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 hours ago

Dems are going to be cleaning house soon. Republicans are probably just a few years behind. No dog likes getting wagged by its tail--it's an intensely uncomfortable and unmistakable experience.

No doubt we'll have to wait for the justices to age out, though.

 

I'm on day one of my third temp 7-day sitewide reddit ban this past year. Before that, I was a daily participator on reddit for over 10 years with no site-wide actions.

I thought it might be fun to share the story of my bans. Feel free to share yours.

The first one was for summarizing Bill Maher's views on fat women, old women, and transgendered people. This was understandably determined to be hate speech by the AI, but was upheld by human appeal.

The second one, I don't even remember clearly. I think I may have been criticizing Zionism on somewhere, probably a popular news subreddit. One thing you have to keep in mind is they delete the offending comment and so you have to guess at what your offense might be; then you only have 250 characters to defend yourself. The ban was done by AI. About five days after my seven-day ban ended, I got the notification: Your ban has been overturned. Thanks!

The third one just happened, so it's fresh in my memory. I wanted to talk about something I found crazy on one of my favorite TV shows: a black woman, mother of two black children and wife of a black man, who was in her 30s living the United States had her FIRST social justice epiphany--and it was about press freedoms in Guatamela. The post was shadowbanned. I commented on another thread, warning a user that the mods would come along soon to shadowban any comments on race. Both our comments were shadowbanned, and thereafter, I was perma-shadowbanned on that sub--any comment I made was immediately sent to the shadow realm.

I looked for discussion about the show's treatment of race (which would be interesting since the show did not--as the subreddit does--ignore the issue entirely) and found nothing more recent than 14 years ago. The sub had been wiped clean of any discussion of race on the show.

I wrote the mods and asked them to either a) lift my shadow ban or b) ban me permanently.

To make things easier for them, I also called them racist cowards. An hour later, I received my temp ban for bullying and harrassment.

My appeal simply laid out the facts: they objectively demonstrated both cowardice (by shadowbanning) and racism (for shadowbanning discussion on race) therefore it is not bullying to call them racist cowards. Any conversation forum that shadowbans members for conversing is obviously lost, and then further sitewide bans them for complaining, is clearly lost.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Israel's deffos lost its halo in the last few years. Doubt you'll find a jury in 2026 willing to squint their way to seeing fraud as ok in service of a genocidal arpartheid ethnosupremacist state.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

I remember hearing about this exact case in New York State like 10 years ago. How long ago can you run this scam?

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, my old and quasi-semi-current carreer is in social work, and I can't get a job because I keep talking about wanting to remove barriers between me and the people I work with and not wanting to be "the expert" talking down to them. Job search poison.

There's a wonderful dissertation written about social work and education are actually the domain primarily of white women, granted that privilege by the white patriarchy in exchange for servicing the white patriarchy. Love and Treason: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/educ_llss_etds/124/ I wouldn't let social work off the morally compromised hook merely on the basis of the existence of hiearchy.

In my own currernt work, I see how the governing board primarily reflects the desires of privileged white funders, and I see how everyone's position is based on kissing ass, at the expense of the people we putatively serve but are functionally just excuses by which we maintain our position and status. I've brought up at least one regular and flagrant ethical violation with absolutely nothing done because it serves the interests of the institution to continue.

There is a position in social for peer advocacy, recognized in my state, that I'm training for. But it's a step down in every way from what my training is, it's a dead-end job, and, again, I'm probably never going to get hired because I'm overqualified and I'm going to have authority by my education and training beyond the low-totem pole position of a peer advocate.

Anyway. What are you doing for work?

Resources for connecting with other anarchists and learning more about anarchist philosophy without Gramsci-levels of linguistic abstraction?

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I guess I don't understand why we are talking about a chat with an LLM. What value does it have?

I think we'll be lucky if it's dotcom 2.0. I think it's going to be more 1929 Re-imagined.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

I remember newspaper machines used to have have boxes with the day's paper. You'd put a few coins in, open the box, and take one paper from the stack. I imagine that was also an available resource for merchandise for re-sale.

I hear people in Argentina are hard-selling socks in the street, too, so the tradition is still alive.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

What AI money are we even talking about? AI is burning capital hoping to capture a market that will never be profitable because the service is not worth the electricity is costs.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 hours ago

Meanwhile, Kevin:

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

En ingles decimos "police involved fruitable".

That's right: my portmanteau implies that tomato is a vegetable. Fight me.

view more: next ›