[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Cohh made a video about this, because he got the very same advice that you just gave. it ruined his playthrough and after hearing his reasons, I know that it would have ruined mine as well. so I would be very careful about this, it definitely depends on how you personally like to play and enjoy RPGs.

[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

and as we all know, taste justifies every kind of cruelty. /s

[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

the preload started yesterday and people have been datamining.

[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

das bleibt hier alles so wie es ist und da wird sich hier nichts dran rütteln!

[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don't expect it to be as bugged as previous releases. they were often fighting against a set timeline. this time it sounds like Microsoft urged them to postpone the release to make sure that the game is more polished. and recent interviews also sounded like there are hundreds of people playtesting the game right now. so I expect it to have less bugs then usual... mainly because of Microsofts involvements.

[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I always wanted to play the first Red Dead Redemption. it was one of the first games I bought for the Series S. that was before there were rumors about an actual remake of the game for current generations.

[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

yeah, same. from all the ones I tried, I stuck with Liftoff. seems like the most functional and simplistic one to me.

[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

joah, das ist ja auch grob das, was sie die letzten 16 Jahre an der Regierung gemacht haben. und neue Gesetze lassen sie sich praktischerweise direkt von ihren Buddies in der Wirtschaft schreiben, dann haben die auch keine Einwände.

[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

here, have my upvote. but please don't tell anyone.

[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It just confuses me a little this happens to a game that is being waited for so badly. If they would be confident to successfully sell their game to end users, they wouldn’t need to force it on AMDs customers.

that's true. i think there are two sides to it. on the one hand, there are also a lot of people upgrading their system specifically for Starfield... for those people, a Ryzen CPU/GPU gets a lot more attractive if the game they are building their new rig for comes with it and you save those 70 bucks. on the other hand, Bethesda and AMD make a big deal out of their "technological partnership" for this game, so it only seems logical to also have the game bundled with AMD hardware.

[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

that's a pretty weird take. just because other games that came with AMD were bad, doesn't mean all of them are. Star Wars Jedi Survivor, Last Of Us Part 1, Uncharted, Far Cry 6, Deathloop, Borderlands 3, The Outer Worlds... none of those are bad games. i think game bundles just represent the general gaming experience. some games are good, some are bad. but just because a game comes in a bundle, doesn't automatically mean that it will suck.

[-] rubberducky182@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

sounds like they should have asked u/spez for some advice on API pricing. /s

view more: next ›

rubberducky182

joined 1 year ago