[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

What do you use? What is your setup like?

40
submitted 4 months ago by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/birding@lemmy.world
130
submitted 4 months ago by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/birding@lemmy.world

Missed focus... Curse the Fuji X-T200 autofocus!

170
submitted 4 months ago by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
230
submitted 5 months ago by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
36
Hmmmmmmmmmm (lemmy.ca)
submitted 5 months ago by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/birding@lemmy.world
170
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/birding@lemmy.world
  • Fujifilm X-T200
  • XC15-45mm at 45mm
  • F8, 1/500s, ISO 250
34
Duck (lemmy.ca)
submitted 7 months ago by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/birding@lemmy.world
[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Ah so the health care system is so bad we have to fight for it now. At this point it is only a matter of time until they make us pay for it. Then it'll be further enshittified. Things are great 😐

[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

I went to the store a week ago when this was implemented. There were 30% off items everywhere. Presumably people were not buying them and Loblaws had to throw stuff out. They are backing down not because they "listened to feedback" but probably because they are losing money. The greed wins again...

158
submitted 8 months ago by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/birding@lemmy.world
110
submitted 8 months ago by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/birding@lemmy.world

Go visit her if you're in Ottawa. https://nature.ca/en/visit-us/whats-on/listing/owls-rendez-vous/. It's free Thursday evenings from 5PM - 8PM.

168
submitted 11 months ago by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
12
submitted 1 year ago by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/photography@lemmy.ml

I have a Fujifilm camera and decent lens that can do 600mm FF equiv is not cheap. I'm wondering what is the best option for bird photography at that range? There are some tiny 1/2.3 compact cameras like the Sony hx99 that doesn't seem too good. There also seem to be an option of picking up a m43 camera with a 300mm (600mm equivalent) lens. What is everyone's favorite options?

[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Yup this is basically it. I even have people arguing with me here the moment i mention the word property tax. Unfortunately a lot of people would vote against their own long term interest in terms of services, community well being etc. for short term capital gains (and in the case of real estate, that's tax free, lol).

This is perhaps the greatest problem facing us in the 21st century democracy as the world has become more and more complex and the cause and effects of things becomes ever more debatable.

[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Not sure how you got to that conclusion. I said wealth, not income. Wealth inequality is not the same as income inequality and taxing incoming doesn't fix wealth inequality. Neither does taxing consumption, as most people tend to horde their wealth in some sort of asset.

[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Sure groceries are exempt, but there is a limit on how much you can reasonably spend. At the rate housing and asset prices are, there appears no limit on how much your wealth can grow. So instead of using a proxy metric (spending) to tax people with wealth, just go after it directly instead.

32
submitted 1 year ago by pwnna@lemmy.ca to c/birding@lemmy.world

And it ate it...

[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately not... They tend to not venture too close and not as common as the goose

[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah. The alternative is to move to a deque instead of a vector (as deque doesnt require move or copy) which works for me as I don't need random access, only fast insert and iteration.

I should try this with c++20 and how it does in error messages. Right now I'm on 17...

[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Resolved the issue. Can't use atomic in a vector as it is non copyable and non movable. Error messages are horrible and led me to a wrong place. The few layers of classes and templates along with the error message threw me off completely.

[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I've noted that if I removed the atomic, this code also compiles and works without problems. So the problem must have gone wrong there somehow, but only when using emplace_back and push_back(std::move)

[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I see it for a lot of different communities unfortunately...

view more: ‹ prev next ›

pwnna

joined 1 year ago