Duck
Ah so the health care system is so bad we have to fight for it now. At this point it is only a matter of time until they make us pay for it. Then it'll be further enshittified. Things are great 😐
I went to the store a week ago when this was implemented. There were 30% off items everywhere. Presumably people were not buying them and Loblaws had to throw stuff out. They are backing down not because they "listened to feedback" but probably because they are losing money. The greed wins again...
Yup this is basically it. I even have people arguing with me here the moment i mention the word property tax. Unfortunately a lot of people would vote against their own long term interest in terms of services, community well being etc. for short term capital gains (and in the case of real estate, that's tax free, lol).
This is perhaps the greatest problem facing us in the 21st century democracy as the world has become more and more complex and the cause and effects of things becomes ever more debatable.
Not sure how you got to that conclusion. I said wealth, not income. Wealth inequality is not the same as income inequality and taxing incoming doesn't fix wealth inequality. Neither does taxing consumption, as most people tend to horde their wealth in some sort of asset.
Sure groceries are exempt, but there is a limit on how much you can reasonably spend. At the rate housing and asset prices are, there appears no limit on how much your wealth can grow. So instead of using a proxy metric (spending) to tax people with wealth, just go after it directly instead.
Unfortunately not... They tend to not venture too close and not as common as the goose
Yeah. The alternative is to move to a deque instead of a vector (as deque doesnt require move or copy) which works for me as I don't need random access, only fast insert and iteration.
I should try this with c++20 and how it does in error messages. Right now I'm on 17...
Resolved the issue. Can't use atomic in a vector as it is non copyable and non movable. Error messages are horrible and led me to a wrong place. The few layers of classes and templates along with the error message threw me off completely.
I've noted that if I removed the atomic
, this code also compiles and works without problems. So the problem must have gone wrong there somehow, but only when using emplace_back and push_back(std::move)
Yeah I see it for a lot of different communities unfortunately...
What do you use? What is your setup like?