[-] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 53 points 1 year ago

This can just be a bad joke. Xmpp is not event considered by PG as an alternative. Besides, as long as you encrypt the data it does not matter on AWS or somewhere else.

[-] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago

Completely agree. They should follow the Jeffrey Epstein’s link and networks if they have the balls. You don’t need to scan all people’s phone on earth. Well, it includes high profile people, so good luck with that.

[-] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

You can use a community instance as pointed out by other authors. It’s a pity that they make this change, but still we should be grateful for this open source product that can be hosted by other providers.

Up to 4 ppl, you can use brave talk. For more, use https://meet.calyx.net/ or https://framatalk.org/

[-] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago

You can be anonymised in many ways. But, keep in mind that most of of them are sophisticated attacks which require a lot of effort. No organisation on earth has unlimited resources.

Why does a three letter agency spend this effort for you? Are you a very important target? If yes they can do it. If no, then your threat level is not that high. You don’t need ANONYMITY, you need privacy.

104

After this announcement, I am planning to reject meetings organised in zoom. But the problem is that it’s really good. So, is there any privacy friendly and viable alternatives to zoom? It does not have to be open source because I nearly tried all alternatives. Your experiences?

159

“Brave Search users can now search for images and videos without being redirected to Google or Bing, though some advanced search capabilities are still absent.”

[-] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

Cromite is a fork, so waiting a bit before using it would be helpful. Vanadium is a good option if you use grapheneos. Even though there are controversies around Brave, it does not affect privacy and security of it. Turn off crypto and other stuff and it’s done.

Firefox on android does not provide per site isolation. I don’t think it is significant as long as you know what you accept by using it. If you are willing to take this road, then Mull is the browser you are looking for.

https://divestos.org/pages/browsers

67
Raivo is sold. (lemmy.one)

Raivo OTP is sold.

“Big News! 🚀 Exciting times ahead as we announce that Raivo has been acquired by Mobime (mobime.org)! 🎉🤝

Rest assured, nothing will change for you, except for more support and development on the Raivo ecosystem. More updates will follow soon.”

https://twitter.com/raivootp/status/1683372954002808833?s=46

[-] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

Bulls*t. What the random YouTubers claim without evidence is also nonsense. It’s remarkable to allege that an open source and audited app is a honeypot. Well, find it guys, it’s open source.

[-] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

+1 as a Proton unlimited user. Yes, proton has some unfinished products, I mainly purchased it for vpn and email( also SimpleLogin). So others are a bit of extra for me. After some time, I also plan to switch from Bitwarden to proton pass. If macOS client comes, then I will also switch to proton drive.

[-] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

I tried it a few weeks ago. As an app in beta, it seems promising. But I am waiting to be able to customise local storage path since I would sync it using my own cloud storage.

[-] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

Is it possible the site is outdated? No mention of Brave, Protonmail, Simplex, Bitwarden, ProtonVpn, Brave search, startpage and more. It suggests Decentraleyes, https everywhere, privacy badger.

[-] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

E2EE is the most important protection for your messages. Otherwise, it means that all of your messages can be accessed just like a word file in their server. It’s up to you

I read long ago of criticisms about encryption algorithm by experts. Instead of using existing standards they baked their own algorithms. They were not recognised cryptograph experts. Afaik, they improved it over time. But there might still be issues.

In sum, trust is not your friend and up to you without E2EE.

view more: next ›

privacyfalcon9899

joined 1 year ago