monkeyman512

joined 2 years ago
[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is just the argument of free will vs bundle of chemical reactions and genetic instructions.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Funny how tools are useful. But a person who is a tool is not.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It will be controlled by Truenas not Proxmox. Truenas can add swap space to each drive automatically: https://www.ixsystems.com/documentation/truenas/11.3-U2.2/storage.html

But you probably already have existing drives so that doesn't help. This might though: https://wiki.debian.org/Swap

But be aware that Truenas is design to be an appliance and doesn't really want you tinkering under the hood. So you may have to manually add the SWAP after each boot of TN.

I would guess the best long term fix would be moving services out of the TN VM and into a different VM.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Maybe start by taking an existing script you wrote in another language and hand rewrite it in C? Then you can focus on understanding how things are done differently in C.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I have TN Scale VM hosted in Proxmox. The only "issue" I have is the webgui gets pushed to SWAP if not used for more than a week. So when I connect it it literally takes a couple minutes while is gets shuffled back into RAM. Once it's "warmed up" it's fine. But my Scale VM is doing these things: manage ZFS pools, control NFS/Samba shares, replicate pool snapshots to off-site backup server. It intentionally have it do nothing else. All other services are in different VMs or LXC containers in Proxmox.

Does your Scale install have any SWAP space setup? That should prevent out of memory issues. Potential performance issues would be better than crashing.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Are you trying to say, "Don't buy a Xbox controller then flash it"? I can understand the decision to not do business with MS, but I assume most people already possess that controller and are trying make use of what they have.

This is not a critique, I just don't understand what you are intending to communicate.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The real danger is that he has the charm that it would consensual every time too.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Thanks! I actually managed 4-5 hours of sleep with minimal coughing last night. Things are trending the right direction.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I remember watching a video where they talked about the changes. Apparently most of the language people are really upset about applies specificly to their website and forums. I can't find the video, probably because I am sick and have barely slept in the last 4 days. I miss sleep ... and not coughing.

Edit: changed "can" to "can't"

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Sure, your feelings make sense. But have you ever used MS Teams and MS SharePoint?

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Both me and my partner have ADHD. Both of us deal with the things you shared. One of us is more avoidant and one of us is more anxious. Does this create problems and challenging times, yes. But we are both committed to communicating the best we can, growing, and improving. We have been together about 20 years. I think any relationship has a chance when both sides are willing to at least match the effort of the other side.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

I can understand the potential problems of trying to define "low-effort post". In contrast can guidelines be given for a "quality post". If no guidance on either end is given it may discourage some people from posting anything. Maybe people can contribute what they see as indications of a "quality post".

view more: next ›