111 days here ๐
Wait until they find out that Google Chat is actually good now too.
Still just using the PWA, tbh. It's not perfect but I'm overall pretty happy with it. Probably won't move to an app until Sync or Artemis launch.
An Ultra, you mean. ๐
But yep, I went from an S21 Ultra with no stylus, to the S23 Ultra with siloed stylus, and it's wild how much use I get out of the stylus. Absolute dream phone.
That's interesting, I've honestly had zero issues with LR on my S23U! It's been an absolute dream.
Love this, you've described my exact process. I keep a compact SD reader in my EDC, and I'll often get my RAWs onto my phone before I get home, get some selects and crops and light edits done, and then take over on my MacBook โ the photos having synced in Adobe cloud before I even get home.
Nice! I'm pleased to say my S23U holds up to editing lots of huge photos without getting too hot, so I'm stoked with that.
I also use a Tab S8 (did you mean Tab S8 series btw?) and it performs well too.
Do you pay for youtube premium?
Well, yeah, but right now lemmy is pretty convenient. No instances are asking users to pay or donate, and obviously many people would sooner flee to another instance than accept the idea of paying for the service they use. But that can't work for an actual business.
This is the level-headed reply I was hoping for.
Well, I'm no copyright lawyer and no enthusiast of the topic, but your confidence suggests you might be?
I can't access the article anymore, but where you've said "if they're suing over summaries of their books" โ aren't they suing over OpenAI using the entire text of their books to teach ChatGPT?
I've just done some quick googling, because your post led me to wonder, and it seems Cliffnotes is considered fair use because it summarises the books, using snippets of text for that purpose only.
Whereas, if OpenAI is using their books to teach their AI, they're effectively creating derivative works every time those learnings are used in a chat response โ especially if the request is "write this in the style of Sarah Silverman".
Again I'm no lawyer, and maybe their case really isn't strong enough, but the above distinction seems like a reasonable starting point to me.
๐ฏ
It's what stopped me getting one. There's just no way I'm gonna bother listening to media on the thing, only to have it stop if I want to pick up the tablet and sit on the couch.
I assume they did this to keep the speaker cheap enough to include for free and at a compelling price for as many people as possible. Here's hoping they, or a third party, release a premium version at some point!