mattvanlaw

joined 1 month ago
[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Thanks! On a newsletter binge after picking up a new tuta email.

[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I guess you mean like full outtage for all users? My bad just a lot of ways to take the verb "down" for me. Still, though, what a crappy company to not learn but fire from that experience!

[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Newsletter, you say?

[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Sorry, but as another reply: pushing bugs to production doesn't immediately equate to firing. Bug tickets are common and likely addressing issues in production.

[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

It's mainly for developers to follow decisions made over many iterations of files in a code base. A CTO might crawl the gitblame...but it's usually us crunchy devs in the trenches getting by.

[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (6 children)

Cursor, an ai/agentic-first ide, is doing this with a blame-style method. Each line as it's modified, added DOES show history of ai versus each human contributor.

So, not nonsense in probability, but in practice -- no real enforcement to turn the feature on.

[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Thanks! I've always wanted an uncle bob, too!

[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

I've settled on a future model where AIs are familiars that level up from their experience more naturally and are less immediately omnipotent

[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is very cool. Any advice a simple software engineer (me) could follow to practice the same?