Guess you can't really prove that, unless you leave comments like "generated by Claude" in it with timestamp and whatnot 😁 Or one can prove that you are unable to get to that result yourself.

So nonsense, yes.

[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Cursor, an ai/agentic-first ide, is doing this with a blame-style method. Each line as it's modified, added DOES show history of ai versus each human contributor.

So, not nonsense in probability, but in practice -- no real enforcement to turn the feature on.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Why would you want this?

If you pushed the bug that took down production - they aren't gonna whataboutism the AI generated it. They're still going to fire you.

[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry, but as another reply: pushing bugs to production doesn't immediately equate to firing. Bug tickets are common and likely addressing issues in production.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hence the "took down production"

[–] mattvanlaw@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I guess you mean like full outtage for all users? My bad just a lot of ways to take the verb "down" for me. Still, though, what a crappy company to not learn but fire from that experience!

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)