As far as I know there is no intention to have Bluesky be proprietary in any way in the long run, just the philosophy is different and closer to P2P networks. For example migration is a big element of the design, unlike Mastodon. But at the moment it's still being built, hence why it looks much more proprietary for now.

and when you reach 10%, you basically toggle the general opinion massively.

Tio ne estas tro grava problemo. se estas elekto inter ekzakte tiuj du, oni povas ech simple diri "la unua" kaj "la dua". Neniu vera problemo.

Also because Swedish is one of the two official languages of Finland, about 20% of the country and most of them in Helsinki.

Arguments that go against the existence of people are very similar to eugenics in all possible ways. We can talk about semantics, but if your take on semantics is going to exclude people, then we have active proof that your semantics are wrong, even if it sounds so simple and right. That is what these sciences study on and what motivates to figure out how it all actually works.

I think the issue most companies don't realize is that we are forcing many people under a living wage, and at that point being paid better is the only thing that counts.

yep, PDAs became more widely attractive when phone functionality got added. or you have an iPod Touch.

That is the biggest reason I don't trust Signal. They implemented Whatsapp's encryption and while technically the encryption hasn't been broken, the way it works forces you to leave data on your device, which has been proven dangerous in practice for the kind of people it sets out to protect.

well, see confusion by OP. otherwise really not true.

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

Only outside of Mastodon. People confuse decentralized, P2P and federated and think it's a free to all, which means fascism...

nl eo en pt es fr de io tok it af