[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

And Steam is a show of success

[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I read the changes, and it seems to me it was a stupid child. Not even someone malicious, but just a stupid love being edgy.

[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I would create an LVM and combine the two to get 3TB in one logical disk.

[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Let me suggest you to switch to Fedora, Arch or Opensuse. Debian Sid may have problems, and stable is simply too slow for how fast Nvidia is moving. My suggestion is to use Fedora or Arch, or Opensuse, with newer packages. Everything was super smooth on Fedora.

[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

But the profiles are pretty poor and basic AFAIK.

[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Nothing will make your system magically more secure, but SELinux is of great help when properly set up (as is in the case of Fedora).

[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

That's unrelated to this.

[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

So does mine. I installed Fedora on an old, 4GB laptop connected to a monitor for her to watch Netflix and TV on her bed. We literally reused a laptop from 2013, an old 900p monitor and a VGA cable + a cheap, poor quality Amazon speaker I was not using at all. I'm really happy with how everything turned out.

[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I mean, it could be possible that the box of the mouse said something like kernel 2.6+. Considering that is older than 2011, OP's answer was absolutely spot on.

[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Such a shame. The best distro out there being hurt by these decisions...

[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

He likes Ubuntu because he's familiar with it, plain and simple. He dislikes Arch because of the toxic trolls there, and dislikes Fedora for... undisclosed reasons...

[-] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

It always did, though. Just unofficially.

2
submitted 11 months ago by ladyanita22@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.world

Hi all,

I'm currently a happy Fedora user, but I'm attracted to the Debian world because of the sane choices Debian has mostly always taken. It's a phenomenal distro, with a lot of support (both internla and from 3rd parties), and that follows some of the principles I care about. It has a long support period, it's less opinionated than other distros, has a huge ecosystem and it's community-run. Also, it's an excellent distro for almost all use-cases: IoT, Server and Workstation.

I love Fedora, but it's not exactly an LTS release, so I have to jump ship to CentOS whenever I need something more stable. Not that I dislike that heavily, though, but I'd like to try the Debian world.

I am not opting for Ubuntu because the snapization of the distro, which is becoming more dependent on snaps as time passes. I like some stuff about PopOS, but some other stuff I don't. If I were to choose vanilla Debian, which one should I pick to be the most similar to Fedora?

  • Stable
  • Testing
  • Unstable (Sid)

I've read that Stable = CentOS, Testing = Fedora, Unstable = Rawhide/Arch. However, during the freeze period, neither Testing nor Unstable will actually behave like that at all. How long is that freeze period and how much of a big deal is it?

view more: next ›

ladyanita22

joined 11 months ago