Again... what?
Doesn't every game engine... well... package a game engine in its games? Isn't that the whole damn point
RE: Copyleft
The idea of copyleft is that you give anyone the freedom to do anything with your work, with one essential restriction: they do the same for their changes, derivative works etc. Technically attribution doesn't have to be part of a copyleft licence, but all copyleft licences I know have a requirement to preserve copyright info.
And yes, it is popular in software (GPL, MPL, EPL), but for other types of works there is CC BY-SA 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike). If you want to copyleft books, images, videos, other forms of text... this is the way to go, IMO.
Some additional remarks, just to clarify:
- Copyleft is not "giving up all copyright" - copyleft essentially "plays" the copyright system in a way that makes sure nobody is restricting access to or usage of one's work. Using the rules of copyright against copyright, if you will.
- In some jurisdictions, there is no such thing as "giving up all copyright" or "dedicating something to the public domain". Best you can do, generally, is giving users all the same/relevant rights.
- Most Creative Commons licences are not copyleft, only the ones with a ShareAlike (SA) clause. Some CC licences are also nonfree, meaning they don't give you all the freedoms to do what you want with the work. The 2 possible nonfree clauses in CC licences are ND (no derivative works) and NC (no commercial use). NC can also be used together with a SA clause, making CC BY-SA (free) and CC BY-NC-SA (nonfree) the two CC copyleft licences.
Diese ganzen Hirnverbrannten in den golem-Kommentaren immer, zu geil. "Also wie in Deutschland" ja Heinz-Dieter, exakt wie in Deutschland. golem.de hat zum Beispiel auch beim Staat nachgefragt, ob du dich registrieren darfst...
As long as you don't change host platforms....
There are lots of things that can break in Docker between Windows and Linux. Not to mention ARM and x86
ökonomisch nicht verwertbare Problemgruppen
Bäh.
At the time Facebook fueled a genocide in Myanmar they had practically no moderation for Burmese content, if I recall correctly.
Pricing is still relevant, at least in Europe (from my experience). I've done a lot of low-budget traveling with small groups of students in France this year, and AirBnB was (unfortunately) consistently and significantly less expensive than hotels.
Also, many hotels don't give you access to a kitchen, which really sucks if you don't want to spend money eating out every day.
The woman behind it has become a kind of conservative celebrity. She doxxes random people, especially teachers who talk about their sexuality on TikTok and sends her minions to harass them. In the past, she has caused bomb threats to children's hospitals for providing gender affirming care. She is about as despicable as a person can be.
The more important thing: anyone can see their posts now. This is rather crucial for a government institution's feed and not true on Twitter anymore.