What is the context for this?
Headline: Old White Man blames racism on non-White People for existing.
FYI, this is the main photo of her on IMDB.
Sorry, for the quality. It was the only screenshot I’ve found. In this shot from “Man of the People”, you can clearly see the dress/nightgown Marina Sirtis is wearing is highlighting her nipples.
FYI, Sirtis has stated in interview(s?) that she was aware that she was the sex symbol for the show.
JADZIA WAS JERKING HIM OFF IN FRONT OF FRIENDS AND CO-WORKERS?!
[insert fainting]
The fact that one student has been in in-school suspension since last year for their hair makes me feel like parts of this law do not fully protect all students.
Pretty stupid to punish a child for their hair.
Hmm… doesn’t specifically basing any laws on a universally recognized organized religion by definition a violation of Church and State? Doesn’t explicitly stating a religious totem qualify as favoring one religion over others? Doesn’t this also violate the Lemon Test since it in no way can be seen as secular in nature to put religious text in any form inside a classroom that is funded by the state? Seems they wrote themselves the reason to strike down the law into the law itself.
This is the equivalency of someone walking into a store, being politely asked to wear a mask and holding a tiny piece of paper saying they don’t have to.
I already dislike the experience of being with other passengers on United. Nothing negative occurred on my part, just noticed how badly behaved other passengers were compared to every other airline I’ve flown.
My point is, I wouldn’t pick United to fly as my first choice.
At this point, looking at this vehicle with your naked eyes is bound to cause damage.