Your point was that users can use arch install scripts to automate some of the setup process.
I countered by saying they could just use a distro that has an installer integrated directly into it.
I also added that in your mind, there is no legitimate reason to use an arch derivative. This highlights your bias.
What was I missing, exactly?
Whew, saved me clicking on this bullshit.
Thank you. Journalistic integrity is hard to come by.
Yeah, only fools think democracy is some silver bullet to solve the world's problems.
What? The Dutch government collapsed?
Can you provide any sources to back up what you're saying?
It sounds nice, but when you mention 'revisionist history' without providing sources I'm immediately skeptical.
What a terrible 'journalist.'
She should be ashamed of herself, putting her name on this drivel.
Yep. Different strokes for different folks.
That's the glory of federation.
When it becomes the fastest way to make rich people richer.
What? It's maximizing profit. Businesses are always finding new ways to cut costs while increasing revenue.
Gnome is mostly removing features to make maintenance easier for them. They'd rather push the narrative that there is one right way to do things and settings are unnecessary. Needless to say, this has bit them in the bum many times and will continue to do so as time goes on. Remember how adamant they were about a sidedock with no option to change it?
Sounds like discrimination based on sex. A clear violation of the Civil Rights act of 1964.
Re-read what I said then try again.