floo
So you admit, there is no reason not to believe what is written in the article, then you posit a strawman argument in the attempt to validate the point you already admitted was meaningless.
How is this anything other than an absurd amount of bias?
What evidence do you have for that? If you’re going to call the writer of this article a liar, you should back that up with proof.
OK… You’ve listed an apparent amount of expertise in the subject matter under discussion, but you stopped short of offering your opinion. Excuse me if I’m a little confused.
Much of the game of chess, particularly becoming an expert or a master, relies on memorizing every possible move and, then, every possible counter move. Mastery of chess is almost always reliant upon that memorization.
The game itself is not that complex, and most people can learn how to play chess fairly quickly. Much of the apparent wizardry of chest mastery is actually just a sign of excellent memorization of every possible move and it’s possible counter moves.
There’s not a lot of creativity in chess
Oh… no. I passed out for a bit, but awoke to a bowl and a glass of whiskey.
But thanks for checking in on me!
This is a big step. I hope other technology companies try to aim for something similar and actually meet their goals.
This is a big step. I hope other technology companies try to aim for something similar and actually meet their goals.
Because, like any Republicans, they’re fucking insane.
At the time, it only just started. Last year, it only worked in five states. While it is because of Biden that it is so good and it works in so many places now, well don’t expect Trump to admit any of that.
But you bring up a good point: progressive aren’t very good at publishing their successes because, I suppose, progressives don’t like to brag. Fascists, on the other hand, must constantly repeat the lie in order for everyone to believe it.