it's not actually any more painful than any wikipedia talk page, it's surprisingly okay for the genre really
remember: wikipedia rules exist to keep people like this from each others' throats, no other reason
I've just realised:
this reads just like a neoreactionary trying to be literary
e.g. the Dimes Square literary astroturf crowd
same problem as gen AI output: too much style, zero understanding of basic structure, you cannot get that fine detailed in structure and be that bad at the basics.
you realise i'm gonna ask for links to your example of this being misapplied here
it's gonna be a massive disaster across the wider economy, and - and this is key - absolutely everyone saw this coming a year ago if not two
Labour are all about the billionaire donors these days.
and a terrible pub
yeah, "Did you know" exists to encourage new articles, or major expansions of old ones. it cycles every six hours I think.
the post history is very infosec dot pub
Wikipedia rules make more sense when you understand they are entirely to keep the most pedantic nerds on earth from fighting
view more: next ›
wikipedia articles: hey this is pretty good!
wikipedia talk pages: what is wrong with you people