[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There's nothing 'informative' on that article. It's just an opinion piece.

[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

My only gut 'guess' is that your original mirror was out of date, then you happened to switch to one mid sync potentially.

[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

well... thats a good sign at least. hopefully it finally latched on to some working mirrors then. I'd surely think it should find that library now lol

[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

this is very, very strange behavior you're seeing then. I have the following in my /etc/pacman.conf

[core]
SigLevel = PackageRequired
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist

[extra]
SigLevel = PackageRequired
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist

[multilib]
SigLevel = PackageRequired
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist

Does yours look like that?

and for mirror list, I have the following mirrors:

Server = https://mirror.stephanie.is/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
Server = https://nocix.mm.fcix.net/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
Server = https://ohioix.mm.fcix.net/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
Server = https://mnvoip.mm.fcix.net/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
Server = https://arch.mirror.ivo.st/$repo/os/$arch

these settings yield me the python library just fine

Edit: the multilib repo is optional in the pacman.conf, as the package you want is in the extra repo.

[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Entertain me, what's the output of pacman -Qi python| grep Architecture?

[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What mirror entry ended up in at the top after running reflector? I can just check the mirror directly.

The package comes up for me just fine on whatever I have for a mirror currently. I'll have to look in a bit what mirror I use

[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

I would check that your pacman mirror is not out of date and sees the new package.

[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm not here to persuade you. If the fact the FreeDesktop.org and Void linux have outright refused to interact with Hyprland over this is not enough and you still dont see how this is problematic to developers that might be alienated by how vaxry carries themselves, then you're not going to be convinced. Either that or you support the toxicity.

Edit: I fixed the link above now, but here it is directly https://web.archive.org/web/20231106152846/https://github.com/hyprwm/Hyprland/issues/3775

[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is a pretty clear cut case. Vaxry is:

Edit: fixed first link

[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

And if the adhd hyperfocus doesn't kick in, it will instead sabotage you into never touching it.

Formal education gives structure and timelines to meet regardless of your mental state.

[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

KDE calls them Activities I believe, And you can set up what windows go where

[-] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You don't need the server. It happily works with storing notes as files and syncing them with syncthing.

Joplin server is a separate product that is for if you want to run a web server to sync and collaborate on notes.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

axum

joined 3 months ago