Microsoft found a fitting way to punish AI for collaborating with SEO spammers in generating slop: make it use the GitHub code review tools. https://github.blog/changelog/2024-10-29-refine-and-validate-code-review-suggestions-with-copilot-workspace-public-preview/
The age of book shovelware has arrived: https://smartbitchestrashybooks.com/2024/10/ai-audiobook-narrators-in-overdrive-and-the-issue-of-library-ai-circulation-policy/
Edit: TIL about the US copyright office website’s ai generation info on works. That’s a thing we will be making a bunch of use of, I imagine.
I would definitely hate to be burdened with an IQ. Such a terrible thing to be born with
Yes we do AGIle: we ask ChatGPT what our customers want and then ask it to write software to fulfill those requirements. Every two weeks it writes up some imaginary sprint retrospective meeting notes. Planning poker doesn’t work so well, this iteration isn’t so good at bluffing yet.
I live like 15mi from there, I would prefer the containment bubble to stay intact. But the tech bubble is welcome to go blow up any moment
Let’s bring the haunted nuclear reactor back online so copilot can hallucinate a little more https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/09/20/microsoft-three-mile-island-nuclear-constellation/
I don’t think anyone is surprised, but brace yourself for the next round of OpenAI and peers claiming to fix this issue.
Can’t wait to see the prompt injection attempts that reconstruct the entirety of paywalled papers tbqh.
ChatGPT, please explain to me the difference between “haggling” and “negotiating”
I don’t see any of them play an if err != nil { return err }
so they can’t be all that smart now, can they
Ah yes, the cia is no stranger to the artifice of intelligence.
I have some positive news, someone did the math: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292924000493