abfarid

joined 2 years ago
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago

Uses Too Many Big Words

Contention

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 25 points 2 months ago (12 children)

How can one be chronologically disappointed? Did you mean "chronically"?

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So she wants to go to jail if she wakes up with a headache?

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 7 points 2 months ago

I have 1GB/m and rarely use half of it. I just don't watch YT when I'm outside. And it's plenty for looking at beans on Lemmy.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago

I love both of the hosts. Wish they just switched to something else instead of canceling completely. Could've done regular science news.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 11 points 2 months ago

It was obviously sarcasm with that 100ths precision rating.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago

iDreams (Infinite Dreams) didn't make the cut? I love their Sky Force games.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago

Your mom ends in butt.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 5 points 2 months ago (10 children)
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 5 points 2 months ago

I'm not criticizing the screens, they are ok and I loved my Pebble Time Steel until the battery swelled and popped off the screen. I'm just saying that calling these e-paper is a deceptive marketing strategy.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

From the Verge article:

The first watch that Migicovsky and Core plan to ship is called the Core 2 Duo (not to be confused with the old Intel processor), which Migicovsky says will cost $149 and will ship in July. [...] It has the exact same black-and-white e-paper display as the old Pebble 2 (technically a transflective LCD, if you’re curious)

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago

As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn't a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it's not "categorically" wrong.

view more: ‹ prev next ›