Valso

Plasma has a not so bad GTK integration which allows GTK apps to use plasma defaults. Also, GTK apps that weren't written by Gnome also have some good integration with other desktops. Only those written by Gnome are hardcoded to use only GTK styles.

Yes, but IDK of any other way to change the buttons ISOmorph was asking about. The only other way is to find and change/remove them in FF source code and recompile which needs a supercomputer to do, otherwise it may take days to recompile. I assume he doesn't want to waste days on recompiling, so that's one way to change things. With GTK3-NOCSD (mostly + some other customizations) my title bar always looks the same way, no matter what changes Mozilla make to it:

This applies only if you update or reinstall. I stopped updating the whole system (permanently), except for a few independent programs, so I won't have to do anything. :)

Is that as original as Windows 10's desktop which was actually a glorified Plasma 5? 🤭

If Firefox is using GTK (GTK3 to be precise) to decorate the window, even in KDE, that might be some good news for him, altough I could be wrong bc I've never used Plasma for this long (30 days tops, long ago) to get to the point of wanting to change the title bar of anything. In Cinnamon (6.4.7) I'm using an old workaround for cases like this. It's still somewhat maintained. I can't guarantee it will work with Plasma but it doesn't hurt to try: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk3-nocsd-git After installation, open (or create) ~/.XSession and put these two lines in it: export GTK_CSD=0 export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libgtk3-nocsd.so.0 and reboot.

This is how I've been replacing GEdit's CSD with a normal title bar, as well as Firefox's:

Yeah, I think it does. But I still don't get it why the man in the third image is with nearly closed eyes. Is he answering the question by mimicing a Chinese face, meaning China told him not to trust what China says?

I wrote AUR earlier. Considering your answer, you don't know what AUR is, I take it. "Arch User Repository". I downloaded the packages from there and extracted their contents. One is binaries, the other package is game data (files, textures, etc).

Oh, I understand now. I checked PKGBUILD and it seems the path is... let's call it "hardcoded" because executables are probably looking for libraries in that specific path - /usr/lib, /usr/bin, /usr/share and so on and that's why it's failing to start, if it's not on the root partition. I'm not an expert in software developing but this smells like a bad linux port to me, bc properly made programs have quite different paths, like this: $HOME, $PATH and so on, nothing definitive like with this game.

By "properly made programs" I mean programs that will run just fine, even if I unpack their /usr in my secondary storage - /B/123/package-name/usr.

There's nothing to recreate. Read what Ventoy is.

That thing next to the man isn't human to begin with. 😆 You can't expect the AI to make an authentic rendering of Chupakabra.