Tbird83ii

joined 2 years ago
[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

But, for some reason, many then choose denouvo instead...

[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

See, i thrive off that a bit... i always stress over having the right map for everything i want to do, but i have come to realize that my players can be just as engaged when they use their imaginations. That, and i use the rule of three: Have three places preared, have three lore things prepared, and three encounters prepared.

We are a mixed online/in person group, using Foundry, so it took a bit to get the vibe right.

I also am doing an partial home brew Faerun, where Faerun gives me the overall structure, which takes a bit off my plate.

That and.. ahem.. borrowing... from all the fantasy novels and bringing them in as homebrew.

Gave my paladin a Sword of Truth, but the whole "you can only kill people you think are evil" is a curse mechanic of the sword. Also, he gets itchy whenever anyone around him lies.

The players found a magic bell that has charges which can be used for multiple 1st level healing words, or one mass healing word once per day, with 1d4 charges recovered per long rest.

I am lifting a concept of Holds-based magic straight from the Ericcson Esslemont GURPS rules (in my 5e Faerun, Mystra is Basically K'rul, and the weave is basically the warrens, but there is a deeper, more potent, far more chaotic form of magic that is dangerous).

My wife wanted to be a druid/harry potter character, so i found a home brew ruleset for her on potion making that expands her ability to brew potions and stuff, with the main limiting resource being time.

One of my players wanted to be Kalashtar, so i have a thing where her granparents fled with other Kalashtar to Faerun, and the Quori basically hunting her family down (yay for big bads!).

I also have another person who wanted to be from critical role's Tal'Dorei, so why not have a multiverse sized campaign where something his character does causes one of the villains and him to be pulled through to a new realm? Boom. Theres the story. BBEEG#1 was trying to do something. Player from Tal'Dorei is a powerful wizard thats expirimenting with crazy magic. Both do a thing, pull each other through to a new place for both of them. Quori want to be able to conquer places physically? Boom - whatever the player and BBEG#1 did weakened the barriers between universes. The Qouri discovered this and now they want to conquer every material realm on the multiverse. Kalashtar character doesn't realizes shes the lineage of the long-thought- dwad taratai. Qouri inspired recently found ways to navigate the multiverse, and murdered most of her family. Boom BBeg #2: qouri invasion.

For sandboxing, i am trying to run with three possible BBEGs, and reacting to their choices.

I made a little solo game outside that i used to determine the BBEGs' actions to some extent and to take some of the pressure off of me having to actually make decisions.

Plus... playing it out, super fun, i can change it if i want to, AND i can throw in flavored encounters to slightly steer the players focus...

I also try not to get attached to NPCs.

I LOVE creating them - whenever i play video game RPGs i spend way too much time in character creation, and then end up restsrting five pr six times before gettig my "playthrough" character...

So i have well over 150 NPCs in Obsidian. All mostly detailed out and such.

And that doesn't include the ones msde up on the spot because my players want to go ask a random guard where the cheapest booze is.

But i will be carrying them from campaig to campaign, so its not wasted work :)

[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Woah, woah, woah...

Its called "sandboxing" now.

[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How long did you have to spend to become immune to Iocane powder?

[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Unsure, but they are about to 100% forget they now have this quest until level 20 and are fighting a necromancer and his army of the dead and then suddenly need to keep turning surprisingly well made mirrors until light opens every door.

Dawnbreaker was a cool sword though.

[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Just want to point out... their "equal" and "correct" map is missing New Zealand...

[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

I see you never learned the dark art of Mail Merge!

[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 months ago

Sounds like the plot to a video game... That video game turned out great for the company that did this...

[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago

Makes you wish there was a store... Or a place... Or somwthing where you could get components for you phone... Like maybe a store that sells radios... Or, hell, even a shack...

[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

I mean... they COULD just use the 2022/2023 study that the Louisiana department of health was forced to do... Mainly , the reasoning behind it was to find incidence of under 18 surgeries... of which Louisiana found none... but had "regret" and "social re-transition" as metrics they studied. One COULD argue that the degree of social or societal pressure could vary from state to state which could inform "regret" models.

https://ldh.la.gov/assets/docs/LegisReports/HR158_2022RS_LDHReport.pdf

Subsection 11.3 - Regret After Surgery: "Individuals 18 and under constituted 1,360 (20.0%) of the cohort. Regret after gonadectomy (only eligible to individuals over 18 and after one and a half years of CSHs) was rare (0.6% in AMAB, 0.3% in AFAB). All individuals who later expressed regret started CSHs after the age of 25."

"In a cohort of 209 youth (median age 16) post-mastectomy for GD, two later reported regret (0.95%), and none underwent reversal. In a cohort of 136 AFAB in the U.S., comparing post-mastectomy to pre- surgical patients, all 68 individuals undergoing mastectomy reported it was a good decision, and nearly all (67 of the 68) denied any regret about the procedure."

Subsection 11.4—Retransitions in Socially Transitioned Children "An ongoing cohort study in the U.S. enrolled socially transitioned children at ages 3 to 12, notably without a requirement for formal GD diagnosis but based on self-reported transgender or gender-diverse identity. At an average of five years since their social transition, 7.3% (23 of 317) reported they re-transitioned their gender identity. In the 23 individuals, the majority reported being cisgender (eight) or nonbinary (11). The remainder (four individuals) transitioned to cisgender, then back to transgender within the five years. Just under a third of the cohort initiated puberty suppression (29%) or hormone treatment (30.9%), with more than 95% of each group continuing to report transgender identities. This cohort will continue to be followed through adolescence and adulthood."

[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

Having just one more critic won't really do anything... Right UHG?

view more: next ›