Steve

Mastodon is organized around individuals. Lemmy is organized around topics.

The Lemmy way is far superior.

There is a save feature.

There's no such thing as "raw" sausage. Uncooked maybe. But never raw, like carots or stake can be raw.
Sausage is ground meat mixed with all sorts of spices and things. Including yes almost always sugar and salt. Without the extra spices, it's not sausage anymore. It's just ground beef, pork, turkey, venison, whatever.

I tend to find them funny, and entertaining.
When a persons response seems far outside the norm, I know it's not about me anymore. Then I just try to enjoy the show.
When they calm down, I might ask what it was really all about. Which can be constructive sometimes, or just it'll just send them into another performance. Either way is a different kind of win.

You care about people or you don’t.

That's obviously and completely wrong. Everyone cares about different people to different degrees, depending on how close and well known they are. It's not at all binary. If it were, you would by flying around the world to sit at the bed side of every kid with cancer you've ever heard of, as if they were your own child.

I would hesitantly say it probably would. They didn't include that in the scan, but did in the self reporting questions. And found no real difference in either groups self reported empathy toward the other group.

Furthermore, at the self-reported level, we assessed inter-group empathy levels (toward rightists vs leftists), and our results did not reveal any significant difference between the two groups, and rather moderate levels of empathy toward each other.

That combined with the starkly increased measured of empathy for others generally, which was more pronounced than self reporting showed. It would make sense that the same pattern continued, even for the opposite associated group. I would expect rightists to be less empathetic to leftists than self-reported, and leftists to be more empathetic to rightists than self-reported.

Your example doesn't really fit the scenario proposed by @CyanFen@Lemmy.one. You're conflating multiple things. (Lots of people in this thread are)
Getting credit for the GPT essay, is unrelated to getting credit for completing the assignment.

In your example. The student would not get credit for completing the assignment. However they would get credit for creating the GPT generated essay. OpenAI does not.

If the assignment was to create a still life drawing, and the student turned in a photo. They get credit for the photo, not Canon who made the camera. The only issue is that the photo isn't a drawing, so they don't get credit for doing the assignment.

((52x30)-1000)0.015 is $8.40 over the $10 plan. You wouldn't need the $25 plan yet.

And 52 is a huge number. I'd bet you could cut that in half easily.

I wasn't sure ethor. My first month (last month), I used just over 180. This month might break 200, I have 5 days left. So I'm good.

Not sure where you are, but there's practically no place in the US you get a lunch for that. In flat terms it's quite cheep. It's only expensive relative to free.

And when you think about it, your search service really is your internet. It shapes your whole internet experience. If that's not worth $5/month to make sure it's good and not polluted with ads, I don't know what to tell you.

I thought this was known.

BMI was created as a statistical tool for comparing populations against one another. It works when all the various deviations from normal average out.

For individuals, it only works for someone of perfectly average height and build. The farther your height is from average, the more wrong BMI becomes.

My tip is: Instead of $3/month, donate $35/year. That way it's only 1 transaction.