[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 36 points 3 months ago

I guess I was wrong about Orbán. He seemed to want his boots licked, turns out he wants to be a bootlicker. Go figure.

[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 31 points 3 months ago

Given enough time, the probability of carcinization being mentioned in any given conversation approaches one. This is known as metacarcinization.

[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 46 points 9 months ago

Given that every accusation is an admission, this indicates he realizes how deep the shit he's in is. Good. Let him stew.

[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Dang, this is a disappointing read. This might be an unpopular take, but I have been steadily losing respect for FromSoft over the years due to them essentially following the same path as Bethesda - they used to make varied games until one of them randomly became very successful, and from that point on they've just been remaking that one game over and over with slightly different coats of paint. I was hoping they'd break out of that pattern with AC6 and do something original for a change, although I was also keenly aware there was a risk that, being the sixth game in the series, it would be just another AC. The fact that it's apparently just another Souls is somehow even worse.

[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 23 points 10 months ago

Experience. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me, uh, you can't get fooled again!

[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hyping up old features as if they're groundbreaking is a proud Bethesda tradition. I still remember laughing at their pre-release hype around the Radiant quest randomizer in Skyrim, which is virtually identical to the quest randomizer that Daggerfall had been built around fifteen years prior.

[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It looks cool, but frankly I'm far more interested in how it's going to be monetized. I bought into PoE early access back in the day but stopped playing after a few years because I got fed up with how its game design is compromised in order to accommodate its business model. Specialized stash tabs for currency, maps, cards, etc. are basically a mandatory purchase, since inventory management is hell without them. Maybe this is an unpopular opinion, but IMO deliberately introducing game design problems, such as tedious inventory management, so that you can sell the solutions is a scummy practice. The same goes for drop rates, which are frustratingly low in order to force you to trade instead of finding your gear yourself, since in order to trade effectively, you need to buy a few premium tabs. Even though I actually made all these purchases to overcome these artificial hindrances, being squeezed like that left such a bad taste in my mouth that I just couldn't enjoy the game anymore. If they keep this up in PoE2, I'm going to steer well clear.

[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is probably going to be an unpopular opinion, but I'm more baffled why game devs continue to implement inventory limitations at all. I have yet to see a game that wouldn't be significantly improved by just giving the player infinite inventory space.

[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 32 points 11 months ago

Now he’s driving their investment into to the ground so the banks will end up writing off most of the debt rather than asking for repayment. So far, it seems to be working.

Maybe I'm financially illiterate, but I don't understand how that works. Like... if I take out a loan to buy a house and then deliberately burn down the house, that doesn't get me off the hook. If anything, I'll probably end up going to prison to boot. Why exactly would the banks just write off Musk's debt instead of going after him and his other assets in court?

[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's unfortunate that the headline and much of the article is needlessly sensationalized. The article makes it seems as if our previous understanding had been completely wrong and was now completely overturned, and that's simply not the case. The new finding is that aggression can be the result of self-control, but it's pretty clear from the words of the researcher and the abstract of the paper that aggression resulting from a lack of self-control also exists ("We often fail to inhibit our worst, most aggressive impulses. But that is only one side of the story." and "balanced perspective, which allows aggression to arise from successful and unsuccessful self-control").

Research indicates that the brain’s prefrontal cortex, a center of self-control, shows increased activity during aggression, further debunking the association between poor self-control and aggression.

That doesn't debunk shit. It's obvious why the prefrontal cortex would be active in the case of premeditated aggression, but this finding makes perfect sense even in cases of spontaneous, uncontrolled aggression. In that case, the prefrontal cortex is trying to exert self-control, it's just failing at it. But that activity would still show up.

Very interesting findings, but the reporting is pretty poor.

[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The article doesn't really seem to make any moral argument (probably because it's unfinished - maybe don't post it until it is?). Yeah, Discord is financially unsustainable, but that's just because it's still in phase one of the enshittification cycle. At this stage, venture capitalists are basically subsidizing the service for everyone. Maybe I'm just myopic, but I don't really see anything morally wrong with enjoying a service paid for by a greedy billionaire. And once the enshittification ramps up, well, there are always alternatives.

[-] Sordid@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago

Hasn't Russia been using these munitions and worse all along? Screw them, let them reap what they sow.

view more: next ›

Sordid

joined 1 year ago