SirHaxalot

Is it really that different with proof of work? In the end the control is going to end up with relatively few entities that have the resources to build large scale mining farms..

Seen a bunch of theories on this but the most likely one is that the washer ended up in a loop of failing firmware updates, downloading the same thing over and over again. It fits with the graph showing that it’s downloaded data. Could also straight up be a reporting bug in the router as someone else said.

It’s absolutely legal for a power company to know where their services are delivered, lol. Pretty sure they at the minimum absolutely need to know the connection ID that would uniquely identify your house and apartment. Not so sure that a generic info like rooms and square footage would even be considered personal data.

Also, based on the other thread I think you would have an aneurysm if you knew how much info is publicly available in Sweden.

Best option is probably to look for providers that support custom domains, so you can point your domain directly to their mail servers. This usually require a paid subscription. Upside is that you retain control over your domain without having to host any email server.

The problem is that by putting a mail relay in between, while technically possible will break the SPF and DKIM chain for all emails that you forward. I don't think there is a good way around this since they check against the senders domain (and assuming that you can't get the email provider to trust your relay server)

Yes, exactly. And by not paying for the subscription you agree to pay with your time.

It also comes down to whether or not it's reasonable to expect to be able to access streaming media for free. You are making a choice: listen to advertisements, or pay the subscription.

Kind of a stretch to call it getting scammed when he didn't pay anything...

This really has nothing to do with Smart TVs in itself though.. It's just a problem if you choose to play YouTube videos on your TV, which seems like a pretty reasonable thing to want to do.

You can bind an exposed port to a specific IP by prefixing the IP address like this "-p xxx.xx.x.360:80:80". Should work in a compose file "ports" list as well.

For outgoing traffic it's a bit trickier, but if you create a separate network I think it should be possible to inject an iptables SNAT rule to use a specific source IP. Might be handy to make sure you're sending emails from the correct IP but with your setup I would just make sure to use the primary IP as email egress..

After living with a pet rabbit I now know that that is just how rabbits are. Full of terror and destruction

Did you make your own community just so you can cater to yourself with mandatory attribution removal? lol.